首页> 外文会议>Construction research congress >Formwork System Selection Using Choosing by Advantages
【24h】

Formwork System Selection Using Choosing by Advantages

机译:优势选择模板系统

获取原文

摘要

Formwork system selection is crucial for a project's success. Despite its importance, contractors select formwork based on individual experience without using a consistent decision-making method. Several numerical methods for formwork selection have been proposed to fill this gap. Nevertheless, the context in which the numerical methods are developed limits their scope of applicability. In this paper, we review previous decision-making methods used for formwork selection and evaluate their applicability in the context of an affordable housing project in Ecuador. The unsuitability of such previous decision-making methods for this case study led to the implementation of the Choosing by Advantages decision-making method (CBA). We provide justification for the use of CBA, describe its implementation process, and analyze information gathered from interviews with the participants involved in this experience. Findings reveal that CBA helped decision-makers represent the context of their case, leading them to select the alternative that best suited the characteristics of their project. Interviews with project participants indicated that the discussion sessions of CBA generated a social process in which debate, argumentation, and rhetoric played an important role in the final resolution.
机译:模板系统的选择对于项目的成功至关重要。尽管承包商很重要,但承包商仍会根据个人经验选择模板,而无需使用一致的决策方法。已经提出了几种用于模板选择的数值方法来填补这一空白。但是,开发数值方法的环境限制了它们的适用范围。在本文中,我们将回顾先前用于模板选择的决策方法,并评估其在厄瓜多尔经济适用房项目中的适用性。这种先前的决策方法不适用于本案例研究,导致实施了“按优势选择”决策方法(CBA)。我们提供了使用CBA的理由,描述了CBA的实施过程,并分析了从与参与此体验的参与者的访谈中收集到的信息。调查结果表明,CBA帮助决策者代表了案件的背景,从而促使他们选择了最适合其项目特征的替代方案。与项目参与者的访谈表明,CBA的讨论会产生了一个社会过程,在该过程中,辩论,论据和言辞在最终决议中发挥了重要作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号