【24h】

Evaluation of OLED and edge-lit LED lighting panels

机译:OLED和侧光LED照明面板的评估

获取原文

摘要

Solid-state lighting (SSL) offers a new technology platform for lighting designers and end-users to illuminate spaces with low energy demand. Two types of SSL sources include organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) and light-emitting diodes (LEDs). OLED is an area light source, and its primary competing technology is the edge-lit LED panel. Generally, both of these technologies are considered similar in shape and appearance, but there is little understanding of how people perceive discomfort glare from large area light sources. The objective of this study was to evaluate discomfort glare for the two lighting technologies under similar operating conditions by gathering observers' reactions. The human factors study results showed no statistically significant difference in human response to discomfort glare between OLED and edge-lit LED panels when the two light sources produced the same lighting stimulus. This means both technologies appeared equally glary beyond a certain luminance.
机译:固态照明(SSL)为照明设计师和最终用户提供新的技术平台,以照亮低能源需求的空间。两种类型的SSL源包括有机发光二极管(OLED)和发光二极管(LED)。 OLED是一个区域光源,其主要竞争技术是边缘LED面板。通常,这两种技术都被认为是类似的形状和外观,但几乎没有了解人们如何从大面积光源感知不适的眩光。本研究的目的是通过收集观察者的反应,评估两种照明技术的不适眩光。人类因素研究结果表明,当两个光源产生相同的照明刺激时,对OLED和边缘LED面板之间的不适眩光没有统计学显着差异。这意味着两种技术出现在某种亮度之外的同样透镜。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号