COST ANALYSIS OF CONICAL TANKS; COMPARISON BETWEEN REINFORCED CONCRETE AND STEEL

摘要

This paper provides a cost analysis case study to compare the effectiveness of using reinforced concrete versus steel as a construction material for conical tanks. Simplified design approaches, which were developed in previous investigations, are utilized to design a wide range of reinforced concrete conical tanks and steel counterparts having three different capacities (500 m~3, 1750 m~3 and 3000 m~3). The cost analysis is conducted for each of the concrete and steel tanks. This analysis includes the cost of material, formwork, labour and life-cycle cost. Also, a general study of the effect of tank dimensions on the cost is provided. The results of this study show that steel conical tanks are considered as a more economical choice for medium and small capacity tanks, regardless their dimensions. On the other hand, for large capacity conical tanks (3000 m~3), the tank dimensions govern which construction material (reinforced concrete or steel) is more cost effective.