首页> 外文会议>Structural Engineers Association of California convention >Implementation of ASCE 41-17 Steel Column Modeling Acceptance Criteria
【24h】

Implementation of ASCE 41-17 Steel Column Modeling Acceptance Criteria

机译:实施ASCE 41-17钢柱建模和验收标准

获取原文

摘要

The ASCE 41 Committee is currently completing the balloting of revised steel column modeling and acceptance criteria which will be included in the 2017 edition of the standard. The revised column criteria are a significant update to the current ASCE 41-13 provisions, and are based on research performed by Popov (1975), MacRae (1989), Brownlee (1994), Newell-Uang (2008), Uang-Ozkula (2015), Suzuki-Lignos (2015), Elkady-Lignos (2015) and limitations highlighted by Bech et al (2015) with the current criteria. The updated steel column modeling and acceptance criteria are based on a series of regression analyses performed on 220 different column hysteresis collected from the various researchers outlined above. The regression analyses were performed to fit the "a", "b" and "c" parameters as defined by section 7.6 of the ASCE 41 standard. The completed equations and justification for the input parameters are presented along with the statistical measures taken from the regression. For seismically compact sections with low to moderately-high axial loads, the parameters and equations correspond with ductile, deformation-controlled behavior, rather than force-controlled behavior per ASCE 41-13. Bech et al (2015) presented three case study buildings using Nonlinear Dynamic Procedure that outlined issues and limitations with the steel column modeling and acceptance criteria provided in ASCE 41-13. This paper presents the same three case study buildings re-evaluated with the revised steel column modeling and acceptance criteria proposed for the forthcoming ASCE 41-17 standard. In general, the revised criteria result in less conservative evaluations for the three case study buildings, with regard to both global and component-level performance measures. It is thus anticipated that the revised ASCE 41-17 provisions will result in less costly and intrusive retrofit solutions, and better characterizations of performance, than were developed under prior editions of the standard.
机译:ASCE 41委员会目前正在完成修订后的钢柱建模和验收标准的投票,这些标准将包括在该标准的2017年版中。修订后的列标准是对当前ASCE 41-13条款的重大更新,并基于Popov(1975),MacRae(1989),Brownlee(1994),Newell-Uang(2008),Uang-Ozkula( 2015年),铃木-里尼奥斯(2015年),埃尔卡迪-里尼奥斯(2015年)和Bech等人(2015年)在当前标准下强调的局限性。更新的钢柱建模和验收标准是基于对从以上概述的各个研究人员收集的220个不同的柱滞后进行的一系列回归分析得出的。进行回归分析以适合ASCE 41标准7.6节所定义的“ a”,“ b”和“ c”参数。给出了完整的方程式和输入参数的合理性,以及从回归中获得的统计量。对于轴向载荷低至中等高的抗震紧凑型截面,其参数和方程式与韧性,变形控制的行为相对应,而不是根据ASCE 41-13的受力控制的行为。 Bech等人(2015)使用非线性动力程序介绍了三座案例研究建筑,概述了ASCE 41-13中提供的钢柱建模和验收标准的问题和局限性。本文介绍了用重新修订的钢柱模型和验收标准为即将到来的ASCE 41-17标准提出的重新评估的三座案例研究建筑。总体而言,修订后的标准导致对三个案例研究大楼在全局和组件级别的绩效衡量方面的评估不太保守。因此,可以预期,与先前版本的标准相比,修订后的ASCE 41-17条款将导致成本更低且更具侵入性的改造解决方案,以及更好的性能表征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号