首页> 外文会议>World environmental and water resources congress >Comparing the trajectories of Shockwaves and rarefaction waves from CFD and Saint-Venant models during dambreak events
【24h】

Comparing the trajectories of Shockwaves and rarefaction waves from CFD and Saint-Venant models during dambreak events

机译:比较在溃坝事件中CFD和Saint-Venant模型产生的冲击波和稀疏波的轨迹

获取原文

摘要

The computation of the celerity of Shockwaves and rarefaction waves following a dam-break event is very relevant and demand adequate numerical tools. CFD models have been used in dambreak analysis, and are particularly adequate when complex geometries are involved. Shallow-water based models are also very popular for the simulation of these flows, particularly when the equations are solved with approximate Riemann solvers. To our knowledge, there has been no systematic comparison between the celerities of the Shockwaves and rarefaction waves obtained from CFD and Saint-Venant models. This work presents a comparison between a two-dimensional, VOF model constructed with OpenFOAM, and simulation results from one-dimensional, finite volume flow solvers using various numerical schemes (LxW, Roe, HLL). By neglecting source terms in the Saint-Venant formulation, analytical solutions for these celerities have also been derived. A comparison between the celerities from CFD, Saint-Venant and analytical results is presented for various ideal dambreak scenarios (dry bed and three depth ratios). Tracking of shock and rarefaction wave in CFD was made through monitoring the moment when pressures changed past a certain threshold. Results indicated that Saint-Venant results are, as expected, generally very close to analytical solutions. CFD results will be similar to analytical solution when the pressure threshold is set to very small value, e.g. 1%, of variation from the initial pressure of the bottom cell. Such findings can be useful in interpreting results obtained with these different solution approaches for calculation of wave celerities in dambreak events.
机译:溃坝事件后冲击波和稀疏波的速度计算非常相关,需要足够的数值工具。 CFD模型已用于溃坝分析中,当涉及复杂的几何形状时,该模型特别适用。基于浅水的模型也非常流行用于模拟这些流动,特别是当方程用近似Riemann求解器求解时。据我们所知,冲击波的速度与从CFD和Saint-Venant模型获得的稀疏波之间没有系统的比较。这项工作对使用OpenFOAM构建的二维VOF模型与使用各种数值方案(LxW,Roe,HLL)的一维有限体积流量求解器的仿真结果进行了比较。通过在Saint-Venant公式中忽略源项,也得出了这些速度的解析解。针对各种理想的溃坝情况(干床和三个深度比),对CFD,Saint-Venant的速度和分析结果进行了比较。通过监测压力变化超过特定阈值的时刻来跟踪CFD中的冲击波和稀疏波。结果表明,Saint-Venant的结果与预期的一样,通常非常接近分析解决方案。当压力阈值设置为非常小的值时,例如CFD,CFD结果将类似于分析解决方案。与底部电池的初始压力相差1%。这些发现对于解释用这些不同的解决方法获得的结果来计算溃坝事件中的波浪速度很有帮助。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号