首页> 外文会议>Air and Waste Management Association annual conference and exhibition >Methane Oxidation and Generation Rate Measurement at a Landfill Using the AMM Method
【24h】

Methane Oxidation and Generation Rate Measurement at a Landfill Using the AMM Method

机译:用AMM方法测量垃圾填埋场的甲烷氧化和产生速率。

获取原文

摘要

The CH_4 generation rate at the Eastview Landfill was quantified by measuring three individual components: CH_4 collected by the LFG collection system, CH_4 emitted by the landfill, and CH_4 biologically oxidized in the landfill cover. The CH_4 collected by the LFG collection system was measured in a pipe using a flow meter to be 92 g/s (492 m~3/hr). The fugitive CH_4 emission rate was measured using the AMM method to be 5.0 g/s (27 m~3/hr). The rate of CH_4 biologically oxidized in the landfill cover was measured to be 11 g/s (60 m~3/hr), based on the AMM method measured CO_2 emissions. Therefore, the CH_4 generation rate was measured to be 108 g/s (578 m~3/hr). The measurement of biological CH_4 oxidation not only determined the biological CH_4 oxidation rate in terms of a flow rate, but also determined that virtually 100% of the CH_4 flowing through the landfill cover was biologically oxidized. This feature, of determining a biological CH_4 oxidation emission rate under conditions of 100% biological CH_4 oxidation, is not available to the isotope fractionation method of biological CH_4 oxidation determination because no CH_4 would be collected from an emission flux chamber sample of the isotope fractionation method. The use of the AMM method to measure biological CH_4 oxidation is limited to those sites that have a CO_2 emission plume that is distinguishable from background concentrations and that do not have significant other sources of CO_2 emissions contributing to the CO_2 plume that is measured, such as vehicle emissions, compost piles, or very young landfilled waste. The accuracy of the method for measurement of the biological CH_4 oxidation rate is subject to interpretation of the upper and lateral extent of the CO_2 emission plume and the uncertainty could be as much as ±35% based on Figure 3. A potential improvement for further research that may be able to better distinguish CO_2 due to biological oxidation in the landfill cover and CO_2 in the background, would be to measure the relative concentration of the heavier carbon isotope ~(13)C/~(12)C in the plume. The relative concentration of ~(13)C/~(12)C is expected to be different for atmospheric air compared with that of landfill gas emissions or from methane oxidation.
机译:Eastview垃圾填埋场的CH_4产生速率通过测量三个单独的成分进行量化:LFG收集系统收集的CH_4,垃圾填埋场排放的CH_4以及在垃圾填埋场被生物氧化的CH_4。通过LFG收集系统收集的CH_4在管道中使用流量计测量为92 g / s(492 m〜3 / hr)。使用AMM方法测得的逃逸CH_4排放速率为5.0 g / s(27 m〜3 / hr)。根据AMM方法测得的CO_2排放量,垃圾掩埋场中CH_4的生物氧化速率为11 g / s(60 m〜3 / hr)。因此,测得的CH_4生成速率为108 g / s(578 m〜3 / hr)。生物CH_4氧化的测量不仅确定了生物CH_4的氧化速率,而且还确定了流经垃圾填埋场的CH_4实际上有100%被生物氧化。在100%生物CH_4氧化的条件下确定生物CH_4氧化排放速率的此功能不适用于生物CH_4氧化的同位素分馏方法,因为不会从同位素分馏方法的发射通量室样品中收集CH_4 。使用AMM方法测量生物CH_4氧化仅限于那些CO_2排放羽流可与背景浓度区分开的地点,并且没有其他重要的CO_2排放源对所测量的CO_2羽流有贡献的站点,例如车辆排放物,堆肥或非常年轻的垃圾掩埋场。测量生物CH_4氧化速率的方法的准确性取决于CO_2排放羽流的上下范围,基于图3的不确定性可能高达±35%。进一步研究的潜在潜力由于填埋场覆盖物中的生物氧化和背景中的CO_2可能能够更好地区分CO_2,这将是测量烟羽中较重的碳同位素〜(13)C /〜(12)C的相对浓度。大气中〜(13)C /〜(12)C的相对浓度与填埋气体排放或甲烷氧化产生的相对浓度不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号