首页> 外文会议>ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping conference >DEVELOPMENT OF TEST GUIDANCE FOR SINGLE EDGE NOTCH BEND FRACTURE TOUGHNESS SPECIMENS CONTAINING NOTCHES INSTEAD OF FATIGUE PRE-CRACKS
【24h】

DEVELOPMENT OF TEST GUIDANCE FOR SINGLE EDGE NOTCH BEND FRACTURE TOUGHNESS SPECIMENS CONTAINING NOTCHES INSTEAD OF FATIGUE PRE-CRACKS

机译:包含疲劳代替预裂纹的缺口的单边缺口弯曲韧性标本的测试指南的开发

获取原文

摘要

Structural integrity assessment codes such as R6 and BS7910 provide guidance on the assessment of flaws that are assumed to be infinitely sharp. In many cases, such as fatigue cracks, this assumption is appropriate, however it can be pessimistic for flaws that do not have sharp tips such as lack of fusion, porosity or mechanical damage. Several methods have been proposed in the literature to quantify the additional margins that may be present for non-sharp defects compared to the margins that would be calculated if the defect were assumed to be a sharp crack. A common feature of these methods is the need to understand how the effective toughness, characterised using the J-integral for a notch, varies with notch acuity. No comprehensive guidance currently exists for obtaining J experimentally from specimens containing notches, hence the typical approach is to use equations intended for pre-cracked specimens to calculate J for notched specimens. This paper presents a comprehensive set of test guidance for calculating J from Single Edge Notch Bend (SENB) fracture toughness specimens containing notches instead of fatigue pre-cracks. This has been achieved using 3D Finite Element Analyses to quantify the accuracy of formulae intended for pre-cracked specimens in fracture toughness testing standards ASTM E1820, BS7448-1 and ESIS P2-92 when applied to specimens containing notches. The paper quantifies the accuracy of these equations for notched SENB specimens and identifies the conditions under which the equations can lead to inaccurate measurement of J for notched specimens.
机译:诸如R6和BS7910之类的结构完整性评估代码为评估无限大的缺陷提供了指导。在许多情况下(例如疲劳裂纹),此假设是适当的,但是对于没有锋利尖端的缺陷(如缺乏熔合,孔隙或机械损坏),它可能是悲观的。文献中已经提出了几种方法来量化与非锐利缺陷相比可能存在的额外余量,与假设缺陷为尖锐裂纹时要计算的余量相比,该方法更为合理。这些方法的一个共同特征是需要了解使用J积分刻槽的有效韧性如何随刻槽敏锐度而变化。当前尚无用于从包含缺口的试样中实验获得J的综合指南,因此,典型的方法是使用用于预裂试样的方程式来计算缺口试样的J。本文提出了一套综合的测试指南,用于从包含缺口而不是疲劳预裂纹的单边缺口弯曲(SENB)断裂韧性试样中计算J。使用3D有限元分析来量化用于断裂韧性测试标准ASTM E1820,BS7448-1和ESIS P2-92中用于预开裂试样的公式的准确性,该公式适用于包含缺口的试样。本文对带缺口的SENB标本量化了这些方程式的准确性,并确定了在何种条件下这些方程式可能导致对带缺口的SENB的测量不准确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号