首页> 外文会议>ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping conference >GEOMETRICAL COMPARISON OF NUMERICAL MODELS USED IN THE DESIGN AND VALIDATION OF MECHANICALLY ROLLED TUBE-TUBESHEET JOINTS
【24h】

GEOMETRICAL COMPARISON OF NUMERICAL MODELS USED IN THE DESIGN AND VALIDATION OF MECHANICALLY ROLLED TUBE-TUBESHEET JOINTS

机译:机械轧制管-管片接头设计和验证中数值模型的几何比较

获取原文

摘要

The focus of this paper is the validation and comparison of simplified numerical models of the mechanical rolling process used in tube to tubesheet joints. The investigated models is an axisymmetric model and planar models with plane strain and stress. There are different pros and cons for the different simplified models and therefore they are compared to an experiment where all geometries are measured before and after expansion. This comparison gives an insight into when the different models are valid. The models investigated is an axisymmetric model, a simple 2D expansion model with both plane strain and stress assumptions. Therefore, it is desirable to investigate how close these simplified models can predict the geometry changes after expansion measured in the experiment. The conclusion of the paper is that a planer model with plane strain is the best model at predicting the actual deformation after expansion.
机译:本文的重点是验证和比较管中管中使用的机械轧制过程的简化数值模型。调查模型是具有平面应变和应力的轴对称模型和平面模型。不同的简化模型存在不同的优点和缺点,因此它们与实验进行比较,在膨胀之前和之后的所有几何形状的实验。此比较对不同型号有效时,深入了解。研究的模型是轴对称模型,具有平面应变和应力假设的简单2D扩展模型。因此,希望研究这些简化模型在实验中测量的扩展后可以预测几何变化的接近。本文的结论是具有平面菌株的刨床模型是预测扩展后实际变形的最佳模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号