【24h】

Automobility: the coming use of fully-automated on-road vehicles

机译:机动性:全自动道路车辆的使用

获取原文

摘要

In a world that appears primarily to be motivated by a worship of the false idol of profit, there can be little doubt that the era of automated road vehicles is upon us. Indeed, such technologies have already begun to percolate into the bespoke vehicle domain and what becomes feasible in the special case is a prime candidate to penetrate into the more general circumstance. Within a period of mere decades, will it be the case that we will look back upon the manually controlled vehicle in the same manner that we now look upon the manually operated elevator, as a piquant anachronism or the particular domain of a specialized segment of the antiques trade? But, before we achieve even the first degree of true “automobility” we shall have to pass through a hybrid stage of development in which the role of the individual human driver will have to evolve substantively. During this phase of evolution, the population of vehicles on the road will be best described as `mixed equipage' (i.e., dynamically changing combinations of automated and manually controlled vehicles). Whether such differing capacity vehicles will be separated in either space (e.g., lanes devoted to automatic vehicles) or time (e.g., blocks of time when only manual vehicles are permitted on a specific roadway), is a question which must concern all who attend this important inception. If differing capacity vehicles are allowed to `mix,' a critical element of acceptance for example, will be how automated vehicles deal with drowsy, fatigued, or otherwise impaired drivers exercising traditional manual control. After exploring this specific strand of hybrid development and innovative forms of vehicle control from a human factors perspective, and briefly considering the parallel development of diverse robotic systems, I conclude my present discourse by asking the provocative question which may be expressed as follows. While we can develop such automated systems, should we in fact pursue this line - f development? The latter questions are intimately bound up in the notions of safety, efficiency, choice, freedom, and our prospective overall social and individual quality of life. Whether these latter questions ever enter into the primary scientific and engineering discourse about the coming technological wave of automation I considered rather doubtful.
机译:在一个主要被崇拜的崇拜利润的崇拜的世界中,有些人毫无疑问是自动化道路的时代在我们身上。实际上,这些技术已经开始渗透到定制的车辆领域,并且在特殊情况下可以变得可行的是渗透到更一般情况的主要候选者。在仅仅几十年的时间内,我们会以与我们现在看着手动操作的电梯的方式相同的方式回顾手动控制的车辆,作为辛辣的代筒球或专门部分的特定领域古董贸易?但是,在我们实现的第一个真实程度的“汽车”之前,我们必须通过一个混合阶段的发展阶段,其中个人人类司机的作用将不得不实质上发展。在这种进化阶段,道路上的车辆人口将是最好的描述为“混合设备”(即,动态地改变自动化和手动控制车辆的组合)。这种不同的容量车辆是否将在任一空间(例如,致力于自动车辆的车道)或时间(例如,只有在特定巷道上允许手动车辆时的时间块)是一个问题,必须关注所有参加此类的人重要的成立。如果允许不同的容量车辆“混合”,则为“验收的关键元素”,将是自动化车辆如何应对行使传统手动控制的昏昏欲睡,疲劳或其他障碍者。在探索这种特定的混合发育和创新形式的车辆控制中,从人为因素的角度来看,并简要考虑了各种机器人系统的平行发展,我通过询问可能表达的挑衅性问题来结束我目前的话语。虽然我们可以开发这种自动化系统,但我们是否实际上追求这一线路 - F发展?后面的问题在安全,效率,选择,自由的概念和我们的前瞻性整体社会和个人生活质量方面密切相关。这些后一种问题是否进入了关于我认为相当怀疑的自动化技术浪潮的主要科学和工程话语。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号