首页> 外文会议>Corrosion conference and expo >Laboratory Tests Comparing the Corrosivity of Dilbit and Synbit with Conventional Crudes under Pipeline Conditions
【24h】

Laboratory Tests Comparing the Corrosivity of Dilbit and Synbit with Conventional Crudes under Pipeline Conditions

机译:在管道条件下比较迪尔比特和Synbit与常规原油的腐蚀性的实验室测试

获取原文

摘要

Static 65°C laboratory autoclave corrosion tests of pipeline steels exposed to simulated produced water covered by dilbit, synbit and conventional crudes all showed comparable low corrosion rates. As expected, the oils themselves, in the absence of water, were non-corrosive. Cross-sections of the steel specimens after testing revealed no evidence of hydrogen induced cracking (HIC). Rotating cylinder autoclave tests at 65°C with typical pipeline oil velocities show no significant difference in corrosion rates in the oils tested, and no evidence of erosion-corrosion. Interfacial tension (IFT) tests showed no significant difference between the two synthetic oils and conventional crude oil with regard to the tendency towards water drop-out in pipeline conditions. Tests of corrosion under deposits indicated no significant differences between the three types of oil. Tests with corrosion inhibitors demonstrated that dilbit can be inhibited more efficiently than conventional crude under the conditions tested.
机译:暴露于模拟的采出水中的管道钢在65°C静态高压釜腐蚀试验中所产生的稀释度为Dibit,Synbit和常规原油,均显示出较低的腐蚀速率。如所期望的,在没有水的情况下,油本身是无腐蚀性的。测试后的钢试样横截面没有发现氢致裂纹(HIC)的迹象。在65°C的旋转汽缸高压灭菌器测试中,以典型的管道油速进行测试,结果表明,所测试的油品的腐蚀速率没有显着差异,也没有腐蚀腐蚀的迹象。界面张力(IFT)测试表明,两种合成油与常规原油之间在管道条件下的失水趋势方面无显着差异。沉积物下的腐蚀测试表明,三种类型的油之间没有显着差异。用缓蚀剂进行的测试表明,在测试条件下,比传统原油更能有效地抑制迪尔比特。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号