首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies >Decentralized versus centralized performances in the case of Stackelberg game between a customer and two suppliers
【24h】

Decentralized versus centralized performances in the case of Stackelberg game between a customer and two suppliers

机译:在客户和两个供应商之间进行Stackelberg博弈的情况下,分散绩效与集中绩效

获取原文

摘要

The present paper considers a supply chain which consists of a customer and two capacitated suppliers. The customer receives the proposition of a new product procurement and seeks to allocate demand volume to suppliers in a manner to maximize his profit. Suppliers employ base stock policies for inventory replenishment. Each supplier chooses a base stock level which maximizes his profit. In addition, we let each member accept or refuse the new product proposal according to its profitability. We investigate the Stackelberg game where the customer dominates the supply chain. By comparing the resulting system performances with the corresponding centralized one, we show that the inefficiency of the Stackelberg game may reach more than 80% in quite a lot of cases. We underline the benefit of cooperation, and provide some profit allocation arrangements that lead to better players' profits.
机译:本文考虑了由一个客户和两个能力有限的供应商组成的供应链。客户接受了新产品采购的提议,并试图以最大程度地获利的方式将需求量分配给供应商。供应商采用基本库存策略来补充库存。每个供应商都选择一个基本库存水平,以最大化其利润。另外,我们让每个成员根据其获利能力接受或拒绝新产品提案。我们调查了Stackelberg游戏,其中客户主导了供应链。通过将所得的系统性能与相应的集中式性能进行比较,我们发现Stackelberg游戏的效率低下在很多情况下可能会超过80%。我们强调合作的好处,并提供一些利润分配方案,以提高参与者的利润。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号