首页> 外文会议>CPES annual power electronics conference >Comparison of Critical Conduction Mode, Triangular Current mode and Pulse Width Modulation for MHz GaN based H-bridge Boost PFC
【24h】

Comparison of Critical Conduction Mode, Triangular Current mode and Pulse Width Modulation for MHz GaN based H-bridge Boost PFC

机译:基于MHz GaN的H桥Boost PFC的临界传导模式,三角电流模式和脉冲宽度调制的比较

获取原文

摘要

This paper explains about three controltechniques for MHz Galium Nitride (GaN) based H-bridgePower factor corrector (PFC) and compares them on the basisof efficiency. The first technique- Critical conduction mode(CRM) is widely used for PFC as the input current follows theinput voltage and Zero voltage switching (ZVS) turn-on of themain switch is achieved for most of the period with thedrawback of variable switching frequency. The second controlmethod- Triangular current mode (TCM) proposed byMarxgut,C. et. al. [1] is claimed to be more efficient when themains voltage is greater than half of the dc bus voltage oversome period of the mains cycle. For PFC operation thedifference of the on time and the reverse recovery time shouldbe constant, if on time and reverse recovery time are keptconstant separately this also results in a variable switchingfrequency. The third technique is derived from TCM) in whichthe on time and the reverse recovery time are varied so that theswitching frequency is constant and the average input currentalso follows the input voltage. This technique is similar to PulseWidth Modulation (PWM).
机译:本文介绍了三种控制方式 MHz氮化镓(GaN)的H桥技术 功率因数校正器(PFC)并在此基础上进行比较 效率。第一种技术-临界传导模式 (CRM)被广泛用于PFC,因为输入电流遵循 输入电压和零电压开关(ZVS)导通 在大多数情况下,可以通过以下方式实现主开关的切换: 开关频率可变的缺点。第二个控件 方法-三角电流模式(TCM)由 马克斯古德等。 al。当[1]被认为更有效时, 电源电压大于直流母线电压的一半以上 市电周期的某个时期。对于PFC操作, 开启时间与反向恢复时间之差应 如果保持准时和反向恢复时间不变,则保持不变 分别为常数,这也会导致变量切换 频率。第三种技术源自中医),其中 开启时间和反向恢复时间有所不同,因此 开关频率恒定且平均输入电流 也跟随输入电压。此技术类似于Pulse 宽度调制(PWM)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号