【24h】

Exploring Misjudgments in IoT Analytics

机译:探索IOT分析的误导

获取原文

摘要

In the industrial internet of things (IIoT), raw data are collected from thousands of sensors. Such a huge mass of data rises to the challenge of performing analytics. In the previous study, Pai et al. utilized varied methods to analyze the real-world paper breaks dataset. The preliminary test shows the difficulty in identifying anomalies, such as “non-linear relationship”, “normal instances with extreme value” and “identical patterns between normal and anomalous instances”. In this paper, for further study, we applied the non-linear support vector machines (SVM) method to classify anomalies. Given complete instances and class labels; however, the result of analytics is not 100% accuracy. In fact, there are 7 misjudgments. We considered that the class labels of raw data may be incorrect owing to certain error. According to PTS, the breaks should happen one after the other during a continuous period. However, in the dataset certain breaks are separate and their next instances are marked as normal operation. In sum, the problem of misjudgments is much more complicated. It's worth further studying from perspectives on both the quality of data and effectiveness of method.
机译:在工业互联网(IIT)中,从数千个传感器收集原始数据。如此大量的数据升高到进行分析的挑战。在以前的研究中,Pai等人。利用各种方法分析现实世界纸张中断数据集。初步测试表明难以识别异常,例如“非线性关系”,“具有极端值”的“正常情况”和“正常和异常情况之间的相同模式”。在本文中,为了进一步研究,我们应用了非线性支持向量机(SVM)方法来分类异常。给定完整的实例和类标签;但是,分析的结果不是100%的准确性。事实上,有7个误导。我们认为由于某些错误,原始数据的类标签可能不正确。根据PTS的说法,在连续期间,休息应在另一个之后发生。但是,在数据集中,某些中断是单独的,并且其下一个实例标记为正常操作。总而言之,误导问题更复杂。从对方法的质量和方法的有效性的角度来看,这是值得的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号