首页> 外文会议>American Water Works Association annual conference exposition >Assessments of Two Major DBO Projects Part Way into Their Operations Phases and Consideration of Enhancements to the DBO Contracting Model
【24h】

Assessments of Two Major DBO Projects Part Way into Their Operations Phases and Consideration of Enhancements to the DBO Contracting Model

机译:对两个主要DBO项目进入其运营阶段的评估以及对DBO合同模式增强的考虑

获取原文

摘要

Seattle Public Utilities' Cedar Treatment Facility and San Diego County Water Authority's TwinOaks Valley Water Treatment Plant have both been delivered using a Design-Build-Operatecontracting approach. The Cedar and Twin Oaks projects went into operations in 2004 and 2008,respectively. Owners using this approach typically believe that by allowing a DBO contractor toinnovate in the combined design, permitting, construction, and operations by customizing thedesign and construction of the facility to achieve its unique performance requirements and waterquality expectations, the designer-builder-operator will maximize efficiency, resulting in lowerconstruction and long term operations costs, and improved schedule and reliability. This paperwill review each project's initial objectives and assess results to date to determine whetherdesired outcomes have been achieved. While every DBO project is different, there tend to besimilar reasons for owners to select a DBO model, and at a high level, similar risk allocationsamong projects. The Cedar DBO project was modeled after Seattle Public Utilities (SPU) ToltTreatment Facility DBO project, which began operations three years prior to the Cedar DBOproject. Many aspects of the Twin Oaks Project were modeled after the Tolt and Cedar DBOprojects. Each of these projects has been the subject of industry observers interested inunderstanding whether the DBO model can consistently deliver results equal to or superior toconventional public works contracting or other alternative contracting approaches. Lessons havebeen learned, and in general, improvements have been made in each subsequent implementationof these DBO models, and those closely involved in the projects discussed in this paper canconceive of further evolution of the model - public-private partnerships for which risks andincentives are optimally placed in all phases of the projects. While this is the intent for any DBOproject, we find that the further we get into the long term operations and maintenance phase, themore likely that the contracts can be further improved based on the unique challenges of theoperations and maintenance phase.
机译:西雅图公用事业公司的雪松处理设施和圣地亚哥县水务局的双胞胎 橡树谷水处理厂均采用设计-建造-运营方式交付 承包方式。 Cedar和Twin Oaks项目分别于2004年和2008年投入运营, 分别。使用这种方法的业主通常认为,通过允许DBO承包商 通过自定义 设施的设计和建造,以实现其独特的性能要求和用水 质量期望,设计者,建造者,操作者将最大程度地提高效率,从而降低 施工和长期运营成本,以及改进的进度和可靠性。这篇报告 将审查每个项目的初始目标并评估迄今为止的结果,以确定是否 取得了预期的结果。尽管每个DBO项目都是不同的,但往往会有 业主选择DBO模型的相似原因,以及较高的风险分配水平 在项目之间。 Cedar DBO项目是根据Seattle Public Utilities(SPU)Tolt建模的 治疗设施DBO项目,在Cedar DBO之前三年开始运营 项目。 Twin Oaks项目的许多方面均以Tolt和Cedar DBO为蓝本 项目。这些项目中的每一个都一直是感兴趣的行业观察者的主题。 了解DBO模型是否能够始终如一地提供等于或优于结果的结果 传统的公共工程承包或其他替代承包方法。教训有 我们已经了解到,并且总体而言,每个后续实现都进行了改进 这些DBO模型以及与本文讨论的项目密切相关的模型可以 构想模型的进一步发展-公私伙伴关系存在风险和 激励措施被最佳地放置在项目的所有阶段。虽然这是任何DBO的意图 项目,我们发现进一步进入长期运营和维护阶段, 根据客户的独特挑战,可以进一步改善合同 运营和维护阶段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号