首页> 外文会议>Aviation technology, integration, and operations conference >Modal Preference Modeling of Transportation Demand and Supply for Strategy Portfolio Analyses-Results and Future Plans
【24h】

Modal Preference Modeling of Transportation Demand and Supply for Strategy Portfolio Analyses-Results and Future Plans

机译:战略组合分析的运输需求和供给的模式偏好模型-结果和未来计划

获取原文

摘要

Future demand for transportation is and will continue to be shaped by forces that have not been well accommodated in past strategic analyses; further, regression-based analytical methods are less well suited than generative methods for projecting demands for modal options that have little historical data on which to base regressions. New transportation modes, business models, consumer behaviors and vehicle capabilities are the primary factors not well managed in regressive demand projection methods. An example is the ability to study co-evolutionary effects such as a "virtual" mode or modes (i.e., interacting by telepresence as a modal option) on population dynamics or urbanization trends. The risk is that current national transportation strategies in air mobility tend to be constrained by "business as usual" considerations of a rear-view-facing nature. In addition, air transportation demand projections are frequently made in modal isolation; that is, projections for air travel demand have not typically accounted for the full context of all other existing and prospective new modal options and their improvements. Further, if the strategy development processes do not consider the prospect of vastly different characteristics of external context, including new consumer behaviors and modal options then the strategies carry inherent risks. The plausible ranges and combinations in trends or vectors in technologies, energy, environmental, and prosperity considerations comprise a wide range of future conditions s in which strategies must be evaluated. Because the ranges and combinations of vectors cannot be accurately predicted, we evaluate policy and technology investment strategies in the context of plausible ranges and combinations of these externalities. This paper describes our team's work to mitigate these risks through an approach for managing uncertainty both qualitatively and (to some extent) quantitatively. First, we describe our agent-based modal preference method for modeling national transportation system demand and supply; then we discuss the means employed to account for uncertainties about future economic, demographic, environmental, and technological conditions. The paper summarizes the projections of demands that are satisfied by conventional and alternative modes for automotive, rail, bus, airlines, telepresence, and on-demand mobility in small future transport aircraft. The results illustrate plausible levels of demand for new airspace and airport capacities and capabilities, previously not well quantified, for which new technology strategies would be needed in the National Airspace System. The plans for applying the method for continued technology portfolio analysis are described.
机译:过去的战略分析未能很好地适应未来的力量,未来对运输的需求正在并将继续受到影响;此外,基于回归的分析方法比生成方法更不适合预测模式选项的需求,而这些方法很少有基于回归的历史数据。新的运输模式,商业模式,消费者行为和车辆能力是回归需求预测方法中无法很好管理的主要因素。一个例子是研究人口动态或城市化趋势等共进化效应的能力,例如“虚拟”模式或多种模式(即通过远程呈现作为模式选项进行交互)。风险在于,当前的国家空中交通运输策略往往受到面向后视性质的“一切照旧”考虑的限制。另外,航空运输需求的预测通常是在模态隔离中进行的。也就是说,对航空旅行需求的预测通常并未考虑所有其他现有和潜在的新模式选择及其改进的全部情况。此外,如果战略制定过程没有考虑到外部环境具有极大不同特征(包括新的消费者行为和模式选择)的前景,那么战略将带来内在的风险。技术,能源,环境和繁荣等方面的趋势或向量的合理范围和组合,包括范围广泛的未来条件,必须在其中评估策略。由于无法准确预测向量的范围和组合,因此我们在合理的范围和这些外部性组合的背景下评估政策和技术投资策略。本文介绍了我们团队通过定性和定量(一定程度上)管理不确定性的方法来减轻这些风险的工作。首先,我们描述了我们的基于主体的模式偏好方法,该方法用于对国家运输系统的需求和供给进行建模。然后,我们讨论了用于解释有关未来经济,人口,环境和技术条件的不确定性的方法。本文总结了对未来小型运输飞机中的汽车,铁路,公共汽车,航空公司,网真和按需机动性的常规和替代模式所能满足的需求预测。结果表明,对新空域以及机场容量和能力的合理需求水平,以前没有得到很好的量化,为此,国家空域系统将需要新的技术策略。描述了应用该方法进行持续技术组合分析的计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号