首页> 外文会议>ASME turbo expo: turbine technical conference and exposition >JET ENGINE BIRD INGESTION SIMULATIONS: COMPARISON OF ROTATING TO NON-ROTATING FAN BLADES
【24h】

JET ENGINE BIRD INGESTION SIMULATIONS: COMPARISON OF ROTATING TO NON-ROTATING FAN BLADES

机译:喷气发动机鸟进食模拟:旋转与非旋转风扇叶片的比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Bird strike events in commercial airliners are a fairly common occurrence. According to data collected by the US Department of Agriculture, over 80,000 bird strikes were reported in the period 1990-2007 in the US alone [1]. As a result, bird inges-tion is an important factor in aero engine design and FAA certification. When it comes to bird impacts on engine fan blades, the FAA requires full-scale bird ingestion tests on an engine running at full speed to pass certification requirements. These rotating tests are complex and very expensive. To reduce development costs associated with new materials for fan blades, it is desirable to develop more cost effective testing procedures than full-scale rotating engine tests for material evaluation. An impact test on a non-rotating single blade that captures most of the salient physics of the rotating test would go a long way towards enabling large numbers of evaluative material screening tests. NASA Glenn Research Center has been working to identify a static blade test procedure that would be effective at reproducing similar results as seen in rotating tests. The current effort compares analytical simulations of a bird strike on various non-rotating blades to a bird strike simulation on a rotating blade as a baseline case. Several different concepts for simulating the rotating loads on a non-rotating blade were analyzed with little success in duplicating the deformation results seen in the rotating case. The rotating blade behaves as if it were stiffer than the non-rotating blade resulting in less plastic deformation from a given bird impact. The key factor limiting the success of the non-rotating blade simulations is thought to be the effect of gyroscopics. Prior to this effort, it was anticipated the difficulty would be in matching the pre-stress in the blade due to centrifugal forces Additional work is needed to verify this assertion, and to determine if a static test procedure can simulate the gyroscopic effects in a suitable manner. This paper describes the various non-rotating concepts analyzed, and demonstrates the effect believed to be gyroscopic in nature on the results.
机译:商业客机上的鸟击事件是相当普遍的事件。根据美国农业部收集的数据,仅在美国就报告了1990-2007年间有80,000多次鸟击事件[1]。因此,鸟的入侵是航空发动机设计和美国联邦航空管理局(FAA)认证的重要因素。当涉及鸟类对发动机风扇叶片的影响时,FAA要求对全速运行的发动机进行全面的鸟类摄入测试,以通过认证要求。这些旋转测试是复杂且非常昂贵的。为了减少与用于风扇叶片的新材料相关的开发成本,需要开发比全面旋转的发动机测试更具成本效益的测试程序,以进行材料评估。捕获旋转测试大部分显着物理特性的非旋转单个刀片的冲击测试将对实现大量评估材料筛选测试大有帮助。美国宇航局格伦研究中心一直在努力确定一种静态叶片测试程序,该程序将有效地产生与旋转测试中相似的结果。目前的工作是将各种非旋转刀片上的鸟击的分析模拟与作为基准情况的旋转刀片上的鸟击的模拟进行比较。分析了几种用于模拟非旋转叶片上的旋转载荷的不同概念,但在复制旋转案例中看到的变形结果方面几乎没有成功。旋转刀片的行为似乎比不旋转刀片坚硬,从而减少了给定鸟类撞击造成的塑性变形。限制非旋转叶片模拟成功的关键因素被认为是陀螺仪的影响。在进行此工作之前,可以预见到困难将是由于离心力而使叶片中的预应力匹配,需要进行额外的工作来验证此结论,并确定静态测试程序是否可以在合适的条件下模拟陀螺仪效应。方式。本文介绍了分析的各种非旋转概念,并论证了陀螺仪本质上对结果的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号