首页> 外文会议>IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium >A comparison of University of Maryland 1km land cover dataset and a land cover dataset in China
【24h】

A comparison of University of Maryland 1km land cover dataset and a land cover dataset in China

机译:马里兰大学1km陆地覆盖数据集和中国土地封面数据集的比较

获取原文

摘要

Land cover plays important roles in the understanding of the physical, chemical, biological and anthropological process in the earth system sciences. Land cover map at scales from local to global has been produced using the remote sensing data by visual interpretation or automatic classification methods during the past several decades. University of Man-land (UMd) land cover dataset is a global land cover dataset based on remote sensing method produced in recent years. The UMd approach employed a supervised decision tree method to classify global land cover types. This paper makes a comparison of this UMd land cover dataset with a Chinese land cover dataset. Firstly, we present a method to compare land cover datasets produced at different time based on invariant reliable land unit. Secondly, we compare UMd land cover dataset with Chinese land cover dataset (CLCD) based on above method. Finally, we analyze the possible factors affecting the differences among the land cover classification datasets. The comparison results demonstrate that most of the land surface in China was identified as different types in these two datasets. For example, UMd maps 51.1% of the deciduous needleleaf forest units in CLCD to the mixed forest. The classification scheme and method used in these datasets are the most likely reasons to explain the differences between them.
机译:土地覆盖起着物理,化学,生物和人类学在地球系统科学过程的理解重要的作用。在从地方到全球尺度的土地覆盖图已经使用在过去的几十年中通过目视解译或自动分类方法的遥感数据制作。人地(UMD)土地覆盖数据集的大学是基于近几年生产的遥感方法的全球土地覆盖数据集。 UMD格式的方法使用有监督决策树方法对全球土地覆盖类型进行分类。本文对这个UMD土地覆盖数据集与中国土地覆盖数据集进行比较。首先,我们提出了一个方法来比较以基于不变可靠陆地单元上不同的时间产生的土地覆盖数据集。其次,我们比较基于上述方法中国土地覆盖数据集(CLCD)UMD土地覆盖数据集。最后,我们分析了影响土地覆盖分类数据集之间的差异的可能因素。比较结果表明,在中国大部分地表被认定为不同类型的这两个数据集。例如,UMD映射落叶针叶林单位CLCD到混合森林的51.1%。在这些数据集采用的分类方案和方法是最有可能的原因来解释它们之间的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号