首页> 外文会议>Spring technical forum of Cablelabs NCTA SCTE >Making Rational HFC Upstream Migration Decisions in the Midst of Chaos
【24h】

Making Rational HFC Upstream Migration Decisions in the Midst of Chaos

机译:在混乱之中制定合理的HFC上游迁移决策

获取原文

摘要

It is estimated that approximately 1.5Mmiles of cable plant is now deployed in theUnited States. The majority of existing HFCnetworks have active 5-42 MHz reverse pathin place. Much discussion has occurredduring the past year relative to expandingreverse path network capacity on existingnetworks and how that expansion mightproceed. Various ideas on the subject haveincluded increasing the reverse pass band to85 MHz, to 200 MHz, or even higher; addinga tri-split filter configuration with a secondreverse path above 1GHz; relying upon nodesplitting and fiber deep migration toaccomplish the goal; and incorporating acombination of solutions. Each approach hasboth technical and financial merits as well asdisadvantages which need seriousconsideration.To evaluate the costs of extending theupstream to 85 MHz or to 200 MHz (orgreater) we will look at the issues involved inoperating an HFC network upstream to thosefrequencies, including RF gain requirements,slope and AGC requirements and requiredlaser performance. The cost of each of thesecomponents increases as the upstreambandwidth increases.
机译:估计约150万 数英里的电缆厂现已部署在 美国。现有的大多数氢氟碳化合物 网络具有有效的5-42 MHz反向路径 到位。发生了很多讨论 在过去一年中,相对于扩张 现有的反向路径网络容量 网络以及该扩展可能如何 继续。关于这个问题的各种想法有 包括将反向通带增加到 85 MHz至200 MHz,甚至更高;加 三分频滤波器配置,第二个 1GHz以上的反向路径;依赖节点 分裂和纤维深度迁移至 完成目标;并合并一个 解决方案的组合。每种方法都有 技术和财务上的优点以及 需要严重的缺点 考虑。 评估扩展的成本 上游至85 MHz或200 MHz(或 更大),我们将研究涉及的问题 在那些上游运行HFC网络 频率,包括RF增益要求, 坡度和AGC要求和要求 激光性能。每个这些的成本 组件随着上游增加 带宽增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号