首页> 外文会议>World environmental and water resources congress >2-D Fine Grid Hydrodynamic Modeling For More Accurate Floodplain Mapping In Southern California
【24h】

2-D Fine Grid Hydrodynamic Modeling For More Accurate Floodplain Mapping In Southern California

机译:二维精细网格水动力模型,用于更精确的南加州洪泛区测绘

获取原文

摘要

In general, there are three major factors that determine the accuracy of 2-D hydrodynamic modeling results as far as their use for floodplain delineation is concerned. Those are: (a) hydrology-related factors that are the drivers of the hydrodynamic models (empirical models such as Rational Method, and process-based or physical models that account for both temporal and spatial variability such as HSPF, HEC-HMS); (b) accurate representation of site conditions (surface topography, channel morphometry (geometry), control structures and infrastructures); and (c) boundary conditions (fluxes in and out of the model domain). All of these factors affect accuracy of modeling results and consequently the extent of floodplain maps, especially in areas with significant urban topographic features and variation in land use, and areas that lack adequate storm water conveyance. The traditional approach of 1-D Steady State modeling is by nature more conservative, simpler to conduct, requires lower level hydrology data (generally Q_(100) and Q_(500) peak flows) and it is readily accepted by the regulatory bodies (e.g. FEMA and the States), although it is often less accurate. On the other hand, the Unsteady State 1-D and 2-D modeling approach requires a higher level of hydrologic data (time series of discharges or hydrographs at many locations), higher levels of output analysis and more rigorous model calibration, and often more effort in convincing the regulatory bodies that the results are more realistic. Calibration can be very challenging when 2-D models are applied; depending on the accuracy of topographic information, complexity of the physical domain, model grid size, as well as number/location of inflows in the model set up. Significantly, the small simulation time step and interpolation of time series boundary inputs, the execution time can be very long even with highspeed computers. In this paper, we will describe the results of 2-D fine grid hydrodynamic modeling efforts using the FEMA-approved FLO-2D software to more accurately delineate floodplain extent in comparison with conventional 1-D HEC-RAS models in Ventura County, California. Although the level of data requirements for the 2-D model is more extensive and the computational time is substantially longer than that of the 1-D model, the results are much more accurate and corroborate with the weight of evidence in recent flooding events. This approach is also gaining more acceptability by the local entities submitting LOMC/LOMR/CLOMR and the regulatory body requirements because of animation capability, graphical user interface, and use of GIS layers to depict flooding extent to which they can easily relate.
机译:一般来说,就二维水动力模型结果在洪泛区划定中的应用而言,有三个主要因素决定了它们的准确性。这些因素是:(a)与水文相关的因素,这些因素是水动力模型(经验模型(例如,理性方法)以及考虑了时空变化的基于过程的模型或物理模型,例如HSPF,HEC-HMS)的驱动因素; (b)准确表示工地条件(表面地形,河道形态(几何),控制结构和基础设施); (c)边界条件(流入和流出模型域)。所有这些因素都会影响建模结果的准确性,进而影响洪泛区地图的范围,特别是在具有明显的城市地形特征和土地利用变化的地区以及缺乏足够的雨水输送能力的地区。一维稳态模型的传统方法本质上比较保守,易于执行,需要较低水平的水文学数据(通常为Q_(100)和Q_(500)峰值流量),并且易于为监管机构所接受(例如联邦紧急事务管理局(FEMA)和各州),尽管它通常不太准确。另一方面,非稳态一维和二维建模方法需要更高水平的水文数据(许多地方的流量或水位的时间序列),更高水平的输出分析和更严格的模型校准,并且通常需要更多努力说服监管机构,其结果更为现实。当应用二维模型时,校准可能会非常具有挑战性。取决于地形信息的准确性,物理域的复杂性,模型网格的大小以及模型设置中流入的数量/位置。值得注意的是,较小的仿真时间步长和时间序列边界输入的插值,即使使用高速计算机,执行时间也可能非常长。在本文中,我们将描述使用FEMA认可的FLO-2D软件进行的2-D精细网格水动力建模工作的结果,与加利福尼亚州文图拉县的传统1-D HEC-RAS模型相比,它可以更准确地描绘洪泛区范围。尽管2-D模型的数据需求水平比1-D模型的数据要求水平更高,并且计算时间实质上更长,但结果却更加准确,并且与最近的洪水事件中的证据量相符。由于动画功能,图形用户界面以及使用GIS图层来描述容易与之相关的泛滥程度,提交LOMC / LOMR / CLOMR和监管机构要求的本地实体也越来越接受这种方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号