首页> 外文会议>ASME joint rail conference >CONSEQUENCES OF FAILED TRACK CIRCUITS ON CONVENTIONAL SIGNALING SYSTEM IN CBTC PROJECTS
【24h】

CONSEQUENCES OF FAILED TRACK CIRCUITS ON CONVENTIONAL SIGNALING SYSTEM IN CBTC PROJECTS

机译:CBTC项目传统信令系统上失败轨道电路的后果

获取原文

摘要

In recent years, many rapid mass transit agencies have chosen Communication Based Train Control (CBTC) technology to refurbish their signaling system or to equip a new line. CBTC technology is a type of Automatic Train Control (ATC) that allows transit agencies to increase nominal throughput and to improve safety. The main functions of CBTC are described in [1.] and [2.]. This technology can operate without fixed wayside track detectors such as track circuits. However, track circuit equipment continues to be implemented on the tracks and in the equipment rooms. For authorities under the Federal Railroad Administration, current regulations require use of track circuit but the main functional reason is to have a backup system in case of CBTC failure. Most transit agencies decide to include track circuit occupied and vacant status into the CBTC system in order to enhance safety. How to enhance safety and keep train operation efficient during track circuit failure is a challenge for CBTC projects. This paper discusses the relationship between the CBTC and the conventional interlocking system when track circuit failure occurs. The analysis in this paper applies to both relay and solid state interlocking systems as both technologies have to deal with the same impact under this scenario. The method of detection of track circuit failure by the CBTC system and the possible restrictions on CBTC train operation are not presented. The paper focuses on the interface between the CBTC and the signaling system. It begins by introducing the different types of track circuit failures and their consequences on conventional signaling system to address and compare multiple scenarios. Then, the paper discusses how the CBTC system can affect the conventional signaling system equipment, such as signals and train stops, once it has detected a track circuit failure. Transit agencies' different possible approaches to manage track circuits failures within the context of an operating CBTC system are explained.
机译:近年来,许多快速批量转抵机构选择了基于通信的列车控制(CBTC)技术来翻新其信令系统或装备新线路。 CBTC技术是一种自动列车控制(ATC),允许过境机构增加标称吞吐量并提高安全性。 CBTC的主要功能在[1.]和[2.]中描述。该技术可以在没有固定的路边轨道检测器(如轨道电路)的情况下运行。然而,轨道电路设备继续在轨道和设备室中实现。对于联邦铁路管理局的当局,现有法规需要使用轨道电路,但主要功能原因是在CBTC失败的情况下具有备份系统。大多数运输机构决定将轨道电路占用和空置状态进入CBTC系统,以提高安全性。如何在轨道电路故障期间提高安全性并保持火车操作是对CBTC项目的挑战。本文讨论了在发生轨道电路故障时CBTC与传统互锁系统之间的关系。本文的分析适用于继电器和固态互锁系统,因为这两种技术都必须在这种情况下处理相同的影响。通过CBTC系统检测轨道电路故障的方法和对CBTC列车操作的可能限制。该纸张侧重于CBTC和信令系统之间的界面。它首先通过引入不同类型的轨道电路故障及其对传统信令系统的后果来解决和比较多种场景。然后,本文讨论了一旦检测到轨道电路故障,CBTC系统如何影响传统的信令系统设备,例如信号和火车停止。解释过境机构在操作CBTC系统的上下文中管理轨道电路故障的不同可能方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号