首页> 外文会议>ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping conference >Strain-Based Fatigue Methods Using Modern Finite Element Analysis for the Assessment of Pressure Vessels Equivalent to the ASME III Code
【24h】

Strain-Based Fatigue Methods Using Modern Finite Element Analysis for the Assessment of Pressure Vessels Equivalent to the ASME III Code

机译:使用现代有限元分析的基于应变的疲劳方法,用于评估与ASME III规范等效的压力容器

获取原文

摘要

The use of ASME III Design-By-Analysis assessment methodologies pre-dates the routine use of finite element software which can make the assessment of complex 3D geometries difficult. Recent progress in computing power and software have led to the increased possibility to utilise these developments and undertake ASME III type assessments on 3D components in more efficient and less labour intensive ways. The use of finite element software and post-processing codes is now widespread and full procedures for direct shakedown analysis and whole component fatigue assessment using software applications are becoming more readily available. Utilisation of these procedures can lead to a more robust assessment in a reduced analysis time therefore leading to reduced assessment costs. This paper focuses on the use of strain-based fatigue post-processing software to predict the fatigue life of a component. Strain-based fatigue life prediction provides a direct assessment of plasticity in the component which will lead to less conservative assessment and a less pessimistic fatigue life. Utilising this software also means a fatigue analysis of the whole model can be undertaken potentially reducing the subjectivity of any results obtained. This paper will discuss how strain-based fatigue methods can be applied to results from finite element models and how they compare to fatigue life calculations using traditional methods. Some of the practical implications of undertaking a fatigue assessment using these methods such as cycle counting for multiple transient histories are also discussed. An example based upon a typical reactor plant pressure vessel geometry using these methods is presented in this paper.
机译:ASME III按分析设计评估方法的使用早于有限元软件的常规使用,这会使复杂3D几何形状的评估变得困难。在计算能力和软件方面的最新进展已导致越来越有可能利用这些开发成果,并以更高效,更省力的方式对3D组件进行ASME III类型评估。如今,有限元软件和后处理代码的使用已广泛普及,使用软件应用程序进行直接减震分析和整个组件疲劳评估的完整程序正变得越来越容易。利用这些程序可以在减少分析时间的情况下进行更可靠的评估,从而降低评估成本。本文着重于使用基于应变的疲劳后处理软件来预测部件的疲劳寿命。基于应变的疲劳寿命预测可直接评估零件的可塑性,从而减少保守性评估并降低悲观疲劳寿命。使用该软件还意味着可以对整个模型进行疲劳分析,从而可能降低获得的任何结果的主观性。本文将讨论如何将基于应变的疲劳方法应用于有限元模型的结果,以及它们如何与使用传统方法的疲劳寿命计算进行比较。还讨论了使用这些方法进行疲劳评估的一些实际含义,例如对多个瞬态历史进行周期计数。本文介绍了一个基于使用这些方法的典型反应堆工厂压力容器几何形状的示例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号