首页> 外文会议>IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management >Knowledge Revealing and Organizational Legitimacy: Comparisons between Different Types of Firms in China
【24h】

Knowledge Revealing and Organizational Legitimacy: Comparisons between Different Types of Firms in China

机译:知识揭示和组织合法性:中国不同类型公司之间的比较

获取原文

摘要

Knowledge revealing, as a unique form of open innovation, increasingly attracts interests in academia and practice. Yet, its impacts on firms are still under-researched. Based on open innovation research and impression management perspective, this paper examines the relationship between knowledge revealing and organizational legitimacy, and how the relationship varies between different types of firms in the Chinese context. Using the survey data from 217 manufacturing firms in China, we find that knowledge revealing has positive impacts on both political and business legitimacy. These impacts are stronger for new ventures than for established firms. While knowledge revealing has a stronger influence on political legitimacy for non-state-owned enterprises (non-SOEs) than for state-owned enterprises (SOEs), the effect of knowledge revealing on business legitimacy does not show significant difference between non-SOEs and SOEs. Our study, therefore, uncovers the legitimacy benefit of knowledge revealing in a firm-type-dependent manner.
机译:知识揭示,作为开放创新的独特形式,越来越多地吸引学术界和实践的兴趣。然而,它仍然研究了对企业的影响。基于开放式创新研究和印象管理的角度来看,本文探讨了知识揭示与组织合法性的关系,以及如何在中国背景下不同类型的公司之间的关系。使用来自中国217个制造公司的调查数据,我们发现揭示知识揭示对政治和商业合法性的积极影响。新企业的影响力比既定公司更强大。虽然知识揭示对非国有企业(非国有企业)对政治合法性的影响力较强,但对于国有企业(国有企业),但知识揭示对业务合法性的影响并没有表现出非国有企业的显着差异国有素是。因此,我们的研究揭示了以坚定依赖的方式揭示知识的合法性好处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号