【24h】

PRIMARY CHEMISTRY AS AN ACTION LEVER TO REDUCE THE SOURCE TERM. REVIEW OF THE EXPERIENCE AT DOEL 3 AND 4

机译:主要化学作为减少源期限的一种动作。审查Doel 3和4的体验

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Dose rate reduction is of primary concern in order to make nuclear energy part of the future energy mix. This article presents the chemistry related actions undertaken at Doel 3 and 4 units in order to reduce the source term.Doel 3 and 4 are two 3 loops 1000 MW_e Pressurized Water Reactors which respectively started operating commercial in 1982 and 1985. Both units have undergone a steam generators replacement: from Inconel 600MA tubing material to Incoloy 800 in 1993 for D3 and to Inconel 690TT in 1996 for D4.Until now, very similar chemistry strategies during operation, startup and shutdown have been applied in both units. They are in good accordance with the international standards. Both units operate under a coordinated chemistry, with a target pH_(Tave)=7.2. Dissolved hydrogen concentration is maintained in the range 25-35 cc/kg STD H_2O. During shutdown, oxygenation is performed at full loop by means of hydrogen peroxide injections. However, significant differences in dose rates have been observed between the two units, with higher levels in Doel 3.In an attempt to understand these differences and to define new improvements pathways to lower the dose rates, this article assesses the chemistry strategy based on the available radiochemistry data, the RCS oxide layers characterization and the measured dose rates around the primary system.Primary chemistry strategy seems to be suited to maintain low level of radiation fields at Doel 4. However, Doel 3 is characterized by a contamination mainly driven by the Co-60. Specific actions have to be undertaken to minimize dose rates at Doel 3. Regarding the high contribution of Co-60 to dose rates, zinc injection seems to be a promising mitigation technique.
机译:为了使核能成为未来能源结构的一部分,降低剂量率是首要考虑的问题。本文介绍了为了减少源项而在Doel 3和4装置上进行的与化学有关的操作。Doel3和4是两个3回路1000 MW_e压水反应堆,分别于1982年和1985年投入商业运行。蒸汽发生器的更换:从Inconel 600MA管材到D3的1993年的Incoloy 800和D4的1996年的Inconel 690TT,直到现在,这两种装置在操作,启动和关闭过程中都采用了非常相似的化学策略。它们完全符合国际标准。两个单元均在化学配位下运行,目标pH_(Tave)= 7.2。溶解氢浓度保持在25-35 cc / kg STD H_2O范围内。在停机期间,通过过氧化氢注入以全回路进行氧合作用。但是,在Doel 3中发现两个单元之间的剂量率存在显着差异,为了了解这些差异并确定降低剂量率的新改进途径,本文基于化学计量学对化学策略进行了评估。现有的放射化学数据,RCS氧化物层特征以及在一次系统周围测得的剂量率。主要化学策略似乎适合于维持Doel 4处的低辐射场水平。但是,Doel 3的特征是主要由污染物驱动Co-60。必须采取特定的措施以最小化Doel 3的剂量率。关于Co-60对剂量率的高贡献,锌注射似乎是一种有前途的缓解技术。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号