首页> 外文会议>Pipeline conference;Pipelines 2011 >Common Pitfalls in Hydraulic Design of Large Diameter Pipelines: Case Studies and Good Design Practice
【24h】

Common Pitfalls in Hydraulic Design of Large Diameter Pipelines: Case Studies and Good Design Practice

机译:大直径管道水力设计的常见陷阱:案例研究和良好的设计实践

获取原文

摘要

When designing large diameter water transmission pipelines, some engineers rely on design rules-of-thumb or a previous project as a template, without recognizing the inherent differences of each project. For large-scale water supply projects, mistakes in hydraulic design, especially underestimating friction headlosses, can be magnified resulting in reduced system capacities, catastrophic failures, or potential litigation. One of the most common mistakes in hydraulic design of large-diameter pipelines is underestimating pipe resistance and friction headlosses. The Hazen-Williams equation is the most widely used method for calculating headlosses in pipelines because it is simple and easy to use. However, the Hazen-Williams equation is empirical and, for large-diameter pipelines, has a limited range of applicability. Conversely, the Darcy-Weisbach equation provides a better approximation of friction headlosses since it takes into account the pipe roughness and Reynolds Number for different pipe materials, and is valid for all pipe sizes and turbulent flow ranges. Although there is an abundance of evidence of the limitations of the Hazen-Williams equation, it is continually misused in the engineering industry. There are many other design issues that can cause serious performance problems with large-diameter pipeline projects if not taken into consideration during design. Additional common hydraulic design pitfalls include: underestimating effects of sediment and biological material in raw water sources, not accounting for aging of pipeline materials, inadequate pipe pressure class design, improper placement and sizing of air valves, lack of accurate transient and surge analysis, inadequate flow and pressure field measurement, and potential need for pipeline maintenance and cleaning. There have been numerous publications on the topic of hydraulic design and proper calculation of pipeline friction headlosses. However, the focus of this paper is to provide analysis through case studies of several major water supply systems that reaffirms the importance of utilizing proper hydraulic considerations. Common hydraulic design oversights and short-cuts can often result in capacity and maintenance problems for large water supply systems.
机译:在设计大直径输水管道时,一些工程师将设计经验法则或以前的项目作为模板,而没有意识到每个项目的内在差异。对于大型供水项目,可能会放大水力设计中的错误,尤其是低估了摩擦头损失,从而导致系统容量减少,灾难性故障或潜在诉讼。大直径管道的液压设计中最常见的错误之一是低估了管道的阻力和摩擦损失。 Hazen-Williams方程是计算管道中损失的最广泛使用的方法,因为它简单易用。但是,Hazen-Williams方程是经验性的,并且对于大直径管道,其适用范围有限。相反,Darcy-Weisbach方程考虑了不同管材的管粗糙度和雷诺数,因此可以更好地近似摩擦压头损失,并且适用于所有管径和湍流范围。尽管有大量证据表明Hazen-Williams方程的局限性,但它在工程行业中一直被滥用。如果在设计过程中没有考虑到其他许多设计问题,则可能会导致大直径管道项目出现严重的性能问题。其他常见的水力设计隐患包括:低估了原水中的沉积物和生物材料的影响,不考虑管道材料的老化,管道压力等级设计不足,空气阀的放置和尺寸不正确,缺乏准确的瞬态和喘振分析,不充分流量和压力场测量,以及潜在的管道维护和清洁需求。关于液压设计和管道摩擦压头损失的正确计算,已有许多出版物。但是,本文的重点是通过对几个主要供水系统的案例研究进行分析,从而重申了利用适当的水力考虑因素的重要性。常见的水力设计监督和捷径通常会导致大型供水系统的容量和维护问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号