首页> 外文会议>Geothermal 2011;Geothermal Resources Council annual meeting >Impact of Reservoir Permeability on the Choice of Subsurface Geothermal Heat Exchange Fluid: CO_2 Versus Water and Native Brine
【24h】

Impact of Reservoir Permeability on the Choice of Subsurface Geothermal Heat Exchange Fluid: CO_2 Versus Water and Native Brine

机译:储层渗透率对地下地热交换流体选择的影响:CO_2与水和天然盐水

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Geothermal systems utilizing carbon dioxide (CO_2) as the subsurface heat exchange fluid in naturally porous, permeable geologic formations have been shown to provide improved geothermal heat energy extraction, even at low resource temperatures. Such systems, termed CO_2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) systems, have the potential to permit expansion of geothermal energy utilization while supporting rapid implementation through the use of existing technologies. Here, we explore CPG heat extraction as a function of reservoir permeability and in comparison to water and brine geothermal heat extraction. We show that for reservoir permeabilities below 2×10~(-14) to 2×10~(-13) m~2, depending on formation temperature and pressure, CPG provides better electric power production efficiency than both water- and brine-based systems.
机译:在自然多孔,可渗透的地质构造中,利用二氧化碳(CO_2)作为地下热交换流体的地热系统,即使在资源温度较低的情况下,也能提供改进的地热热能提取。这样的系统称为CO_2羽状地热(CPG)系统,有潜力允许扩大地热能的利用,同时通过使用现有技术来支持快速实施。在这里,我们将CPG热量提取作为储层渗透率的函数,并与水和盐水地热提取进行了比较。我们发现,对于储层渗透率低于2×10〜(-14)至2×10〜(-13)m〜2,取决于地层温度和压力,CPG的水力发电效率要高于水基和盐水基。系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号