【24h】

Meta-heuristic optimization reloaded

机译:重新加载元启发式优化

获取原文

摘要

We consider the meta-heuristic approach to optimization as to be performed in four stages (model, optimality, algorithm, verification), and point out the potential of varying the optimality stage, in contrary to the design of new algorithms. Thus, we can also apply the meta-heuristic approach to optimization to the task of fair distribution of indivisible or elastic goods, where the optimality is represented by (set-theoretic) fairness relations. As a demonstration, we fix a meta-heuristic algorithm (here a generalized version of the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm SPEA2) and provide a set of 15 fairness relations, along with the discussion of general design principles for relations, to handle the Wireless Channel Allocation problem. For validation, comparison with an equal-effort random search is used. The demonstration shows that while all relations represent a similar model (they are all directly or indirectly related to the Bottleneck Flow Control algorithm), the performance varies widely. In particular, representing fairness of distribution by ordered proportional fairness or by exponential Ordered-Ordered Weighted Averaging appears to be in favour of a successfull meta-heuristic search.
机译:我们认为优化的元启发式方法要在四个阶段(模型,最优性,算法,验证)中执行,并指出与新算法的设计相反,改变最优性阶段的潜力。因此,我们还可以将元启发式方法应用于优化以不可分割的或弹性的商品的公平分配的任务,其中最优性由(理论集)公平关系表示。作为演示,我们修复了元启发式算法(此处是“强度帕累托进化算法” SPEA2的通用版本),并提供了一组15种公平关系,并讨论了关系的一般设计原理,以处理无线信道分配问题。为了进行验证,使用与同等努力随机搜索进行比较。演示表明,尽管所有关系都代表一个相似的模型(它们都与瓶颈流控制算法直接或间接相关),但是性能却相差很大。尤其是,用有序的比例公平性或指数有序的有序加权加权平均来表示分布的公平性似乎有利于成功的元启发式搜索。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号