首页> 外文会议>Annual conference of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering 2011 >Seismic Performance Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Special, Intermediate and Ordinary Moment Resisting Frame Buildings
【24h】

Seismic Performance Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Special, Intermediate and Ordinary Moment Resisting Frame Buildings

机译:钢筋混凝土特,中,普通抗弯框架房屋的抗震性能评估

获取原文

摘要

ACI318-05 code, the building code requirements for structural concrete, contains provisions for three different levels of ductility for moment resisting frames (MRFs) named special (SMRF), intermediate (IMRF) and ordinary (OMRF) types. In this paper, the ductility of these three systems is quantified in order to observe the differences in performance. Three two-bay reinforced concrete (RC) moment resisting frame (MRF) buildings with mentioned levels of ductility and three different heights (five, nine and fifteen storey buildings) are modeled and designed with special attention to chapter 21 of ACI318-05. The key difference among different types of MRFs is the difference in transverse reinforcement arrangement. Variety in configuration of transverse reinforcement leads to different confinement. Mander model was applied to determine the behaviour of each member and the results are compared with the modelling parameters of available code's provisions. In order to evaluate the performance of the buildings, pushover analyses have been conducted according to ATC40 and FEMA-356 and comparisons are made among the capacity of structures. In addition, nonlinear dynamic time history analyses have also been performed according to FEMA-356 using different ground excitation e.g. Imperial Valley spectrum. The development of plastic hinges has been monitored and comparisons are made using diagrams of story drifts and absolute roof displacements.
机译:ACI318-05规范(结构混凝土的建筑规范要求)包含三种级别的延性的规定,分别用于命名为特殊(SMRF),中级(IMRF)和普通(OMRF)类型的抗弯框架(MRF)。在本文中,对这三个系统的延展性进行了量化,以观察性能的差异。建模和设计了三座两室钢筋混凝土(RC)抗弯框架(MRF)建筑,它们具有上述提到的延性水平和三层不同的高度(五层,九层和十五层建筑),并特别注意ACI318-05的第21章。不同类型的MRF之间的主要区别在于横向钢筋布置的差异。横向加强件构造的不同导致不同的限制。应用Mander模型确定每个成员的行为,并将结果与​​可用代码规定的建模参数进行比较。为了评估建筑物的性能,根据ATC40和FEMA-356进行了推覆分析,并对结构的能力进行了比较。另外,还根据FEMA-356使用了不同的地面激励,例如,非线性动态时程分析。帝王谷光谱。监测了塑料铰链的发展,并使用了层间位移和屋顶绝对位移的图表进行了比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号