首页> 外文会议>Conference on physics of medical imaging >Evaluation and Comparison of High-Resolution (HR) and High-Light (HL) Phosphors in the Micro-Angiographic Fluoroscope (MAF) using Generalized Linear Systems Analyses (GMTF, GDQE) that include the Effect of Scatter, Magnification and Detector Characteristics
【24h】

Evaluation and Comparison of High-Resolution (HR) and High-Light (HL) Phosphors in the Micro-Angiographic Fluoroscope (MAF) using Generalized Linear Systems Analyses (GMTF, GDQE) that include the Effect of Scatter, Magnification and Detector Characteristics

机译:使用广义线性系统分析(GMTF,GDQE)评估和比较微血管荧光镜(MAF)中的高分辨率(HR)和高光(HL)荧光粉,其中包括散射,放大倍数和检测器特性的影响

获取原文

摘要

In this study, we evaluated the imaging characteristics of the high-resolution, high-sensitivity micro-angiographic fluoroscope (MAF) with 35-micron pixel-pitch when used with different commercially-available 300 micron thick phosphors: the high resolution (HR) and high light (HL) from Hamamatsu. The purpose of this evaluation was to see if the HL phosphor with its higher screen efficiency could be replaced with the HR phosphor to achieve improved resolution without an increase in noise resulting from the HR's decreased light-photon yield. We designated the detectors MAF-HR and MAF-HL and compared them with a standard flat panel detector (FPD) (194 micron pixel pitch and 600 micron thick CsI(Tl)). For this comparison, we used the generalized linear-system metrics of GMTF, GNNPS and GDQE which are more realistic measures of total system performance since they include the effect of scattered radiation, focal spot distribution, and geometric un-sharpness. Magnifications (1.05-1.15) and scatter fractions (0.28 and 0.33) characteristic of a standard head phantom were used. The MAF-HR performed significantly better than the MAF-HL at high spatial frequencies. The ratio of GMTF and GDQE of the MAF-HR compared to the MAF-HL at 3(6) cycles/mm was 1.45(2.42) and 1.23(2.89), respectively. Despite significant degradation by inclusion of scatter and object magnification, both MAF-HR and MAF-HL provide superior performance over the FPD at higher spatial frequencies with similar performance up to the FPD's Nyquist frequency of 2.5 cycles/mm. Both substantially higher resolution and improved GDQE can be achieved with the MAF using the HR phosphor instead of the HL phosphor.
机译:在这项研究中,我们评估了与35微米像素间距的高分辨率,高灵敏度微血管造影荧光镜(MAF)的成像特性,与不同的市售300微米厚荧光粉一起使用:高分辨率(HR)和Hamamatsu的高光(HL)。评估的目的是查看具有较高屏幕效率的HL荧光粉是否可以被HR荧光粉代替,从而在不增加因HR的光子产量降低而导致的噪声增加的情况下实现更高的分辨率。我们指定了检测器MAF-HR和MAF-HL,并将它们与标准平板检测器(FPD)(194微米像素间距和600微米厚CsI(Tl))进行了比较。为了进行比较,我们使用了GMTF,GNNPS和GDQE的广义线性系统度量,它们是总体系统性能的更实际度量,因为它们包括散射辐射,焦点分布和几何不清晰度的影响。使用标准头部模型的放大倍率(1.05-1.15)和散射分数(0.28和0.33)。在高空间频率下,MAF-HR的性能明显优于MAF-HL。在3(6)个循环/毫米时,MAF-HR的GMTF和GDQE与MAF-HL的比率分别为1.45(2.42)和1.23(2.89)。尽管由于散射和物体放大而导致的显着退化,但MAF-HR和MAF-HL均在较高空间频率下提供了优于FPD的性能,并且在FPD的奈奎斯特频率为2.5个周期/毫米的情况下仍具有类似的性能。使用HR荧光粉而不是HL荧光粉的MAF可以实现更高的分辨率和更高的GDQE。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号