首页> 外文会议>Asia Pacific conference on biomechanics;International conference on biomedical engineering;ICBME;APBiomech;World congress of biomechanics;WCB 2010 >Fluid Structure Interaction of Patient Specific Internal Carotid Aneurysms: A Comparison with Solid Stress Models
【24h】

Fluid Structure Interaction of Patient Specific Internal Carotid Aneurysms: A Comparison with Solid Stress Models

机译:患者特定的颈内动脉瘤的流体结构相互作用:与固体应力模型的比较。

获取原文

摘要

An intracranial aneurysm (IA) is a pathological dilatation of the cerebral artery wall. In clinical practice it is currently widely accepted that maximum diameter of IA is an indicator for patient whether to treat or not. But studies have demonstrated that maximum diameter is not a reliable determinant of IA rupture. According to the theory of strength, if the stress value exceeds the strength limit of material, it will result in failure. So wall stress may be a better indicator to predict aneu-rismal rupture (failure). Study about wall stress calculated from solid stress model using static pressure has been performed. But blood flow and pressure inside IA are not steady. The dynamic interaction between the unsteady flow and wall may influence the distribution and magnitude of wall stress. The objective of the present study was to compare static and dynamic wall stress analysis of patient specific IA. Patient-specific model of cerebral aneurysm whose host artery has large bending was created from CT data. Simulations about fluid structure interaction model and static structural model were carried out respectively. Commercial software Ansys 11 was used for simulation. The results demonstrated that FSI can change local wall stresses slightly. However, as far as the peak wall stress is concerned, the change of wall stress is negligible. Therefore static structural simulation can be used to predict rupture risk of aneurysm if wall stress was used as an indicator of aneurismal rupture and computational cost can be reduced greatly.
机译:颅内动脉瘤(IA)是脑动脉壁的病理性扩张。在临床实践中,目前广泛接受的是IA的最大直径是患者是否要治疗的指标。但是研究表明,最大直径不是IA破裂的可靠决定因素。根据强度理论,如果应力值超过材料的强度极限,将导致失效。因此,壁应力可能是预测神经性破裂(失败)的更好指标。研究了利用静压力从固体应力模型计算得出的壁应力。但是IA内部的血液流动和压力并不稳定。非恒定流与壁之间的动态相互作用可能会影响壁应力的分布和大小。本研究的目的是比较患者特定IA的静态和动态壁应力分析。根据CT数据,创建宿主动脉弯曲较大的脑动脉瘤患者特定模型。分别进行了流体结构相互作用模型和静态结构模型的仿真。商业软件Ansys 11用于仿真。结果表明,FSI可以稍微改变局部壁应力。然而,就峰值壁应力而言,壁应力的变化可以忽略不计。因此,如果将壁应力用作动脉瘤破裂的指标,则可以使用静态结构模拟来预测动脉瘤的破裂风险,并且可以大大降低计算成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号