首页> 外文会议>World environmental and water resources congress >World Water Congress - 2010 Sea vs. Bay Water Desalination: Which One is for You?
【24h】

World Water Congress - 2010 Sea vs. Bay Water Desalination: Which One is for You?

机译:世界水上大会-2010海水与海湾海水淡化:哪一个适合您?

获取原文

摘要

Both brackish water desalination and seawater desalination processes are well established and in common use around the globe to create new water supply sources. The farther the location of the source water from the ocean or seashore, the lower the salinity (TDS) of the water and the lower the osmotic pressure that needs to be overcome when desalinated water is produced. This is one of the major reasons that brackish desalination is often considered less costly than seawater desalination.A number of project considerations, however, indicate that seawater desalination can be beneficial and more cost-effective than brackish water desalination. To make a fair comparison, we need to properly compare all major aspects of both types of projects to define the best and most appropriate desalination technology. While brackish water has less feed water TDS, it is more challenging to dispose of the produced concentrate. Also, although brackish water desalination needs less energy to overcome osmotic pressure, it usually requires more energy to draw the water from the well than it takes to pump seawater from the open ocean intake. Another factor is that the temperature of the brackish well water may be lower than the temperature of ocean water, giving seawater desalination an advantage in energy demand.In comparing brackish to seawater desalination, these major aspects should be evaluated:Locations of seawater and brackish water plants, relative to the major consumers of the desalinated water,Transportation (pumping and disposal) costs of the feed water and produced water,Potential colocation of a seawater plant with a large industrial user (e.g., power plant) of the seawater for cooling or other purposes,Produced quality of brackish water and seawater desalination in terms of major minerals and emerging contaminants,Sustainability of the water source: capacity and depth of the brackish water wells, as well as the type of soil.Technical and economic aspects of produced concentrate disposal,
机译:咸淡水淡化和海水淡化工艺均已建立,并且在全球范围内普遍使用以创造新的供水源。来自海洋或海滨的水源位置越远,水的盐度(TDS)越低,生产淡化水时需要克服的渗透压就越低。这是通常认为咸淡化比海水淡化便宜的主要原因之一。 然而,许多项目考虑表明,与淡盐水淡化相比,海水淡化可能是有益的,并且更具成本效益。为了进行公平的比较,我们需要适当地比较这两种类型项目的所有主要方面,以定义最佳和最合适的淡化技术。虽然微咸水的给水TDS较少,但是处理产生的浓缩液则更具挑战性。同样,尽管微咸水淡化需要较少的能量来克服渗透压,但是与从公海中抽出海水所需的能量相比,从井中抽水通常需要更多的能量。另一个因素是微咸井水的温度可能低于海水的温度,这使海水淡化在能源需求方面具有优势。 在将咸淡水与海水淡化进行比较时,应评估以下主要方面: 海水和咸淡水厂相对于主要淡化水用户的位置, 给水和采出水的运输(泵送和处置)成本, 海水厂与大量工业用海水(例如发电厂)在冷却或其他目的方面的潜在共置, 就主要矿物质和新出现的污染物而言,产生了咸淡水和海水淡化的质量, 水源的可持续性:微咸水井的容量和深度,以及土壤的类型。 生产的精矿处置的技术和经济方面,

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号