首页> 外文会议>ASME pressure vessels and piping conference;PVP2009 >STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT OF RPVWITH BRITTLE FRACTURE CRITERION: ISSUES AND ADVANCED APPROACHES
【24h】

STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT OF RPVWITH BRITTLE FRACTURE CRITERION: ISSUES AND ADVANCED APPROACHES

机译:RPV脆性断裂准则的结构完整性评估:问题和高级方法

获取原文

摘要

A key input to calculation of the structural integrity of the RPV by the brittle fracture criterion is known to be the fracture toughness of a material. When calculating resistance of RPV to brittle fracture it was taken earlier that fracture toughness, K_(JC), depends only on temperature, and does not depend on thickness of specimens if this thickness is sufficiently large so that the plane strain condition is satisfied.To date it has become clear by many researches that K_(JC) depends on a crack front length. This follows from the statistical nature of brittle fracture in steels. It means that for adequate assessment of RPV structural integrity, the dependence of K_(JC) on the postulated flaw size has to be taken into account. Moreover, it has been shown that the K_(JC) values for specimens with shallow cracks are larger than for specimens with deep cracks, and the K_(JC) values obtained from small-size fracture toughness specimens (for example, pre-cracked Charpy specimens) are larger than the values for CT specimens with thickness of 25 mm, and K_(JC) values may be affected load biaxiality. These findings are explained by the loss of constraint.Thus, for adequate assessment of RPV structural integrity by the brittle fracture criterion, the scale factor has to be taken into account, with two causes being responsible: the physical cause connected with the statistical nature of brittle fracture and the mechanical one related to the difference in constraint for specimens of various geometries. This analysis is important for assessment of RPV structural integrity because i) for most cases the postulated flaws in RPV, due to their size and location, may be considered as shallow cracks; ii) the K_(JC) values for irradiated RPV steels are usually obtained from small-size surveillance specimens that are as a rule, pre-cracked Charpy specimens; iii) for a postulated flaw in RPV, a load acts both perpendicular and along a crack front, i.e. loading is biaxial.For adequate assessment of RPV structural integrity by the brittle fracture criterion it is also necessary to take into account that distribution of the stress intensity factor along a crack front in RPV is heterogeneous, and loading is non-monotonic and non-isothermal.In the present report, advanced approaches are considered for assessment of RPV structural integrity that allow solving the above problems. The considered approaches have been included in Russian Standards for assessment of RPV structural integrity.
机译:已知通过脆性断裂准则计算RPV的结构完整性的关键输入是材料的断裂韧性。在计算RPV对脆性断裂的抵抗力时,较早地认为,断裂韧性K_(JC)仅取决于温度,并且如果该厚度足够大从而满足平面应变条件,则不取决于试样的厚度。 迄今为止,许多研究已经清楚地表明,K_(JC)取决于裂纹的前沿长度。这归因于钢的脆性断裂的统计性质。这意味着为了充分评估RPV结构完整性,必须考虑K_(JC)对假定缺陷尺寸的依赖性。此外,已经表明,具有浅裂纹的样品的K_(JC)值大于具有深裂纹的样品的K_(JC)值,并且从小尺寸断裂韧性样品(例如预裂纹的夏比(Charpy))获得的K_(JC)值标本)大于厚度为25 mm的CT标本的值,并且K_(JC)值可能会影响载荷双轴性。这些发现可以解释为缺乏约束。 因此,为了通过脆性断裂标准对RPV结构完整性进行充分评估,必须考虑比例因子,其中有两个原因:与脆性断裂的统计性质有关的物理原因和与差异有关的机械性原因限制了各种几何形状的标本。该分析对于评估RPV结构的完整性非常重要,因为:i)在大多数情况下,由于RPV的大小和位置而假定的缺陷可能被视为浅裂缝; ii)辐照的RPV钢的K_(JC)值通常是从小型监测样品(通常是预破裂的夏比样品)获得的; iii)对于RPV中假定的缺陷,载荷既沿垂直方向又沿裂纹前沿作用,即载荷是双轴的。 为了通过脆性断裂准则充分评估RPV结构完整性,还必须考虑到RPV中沿裂纹前沿的应力强度因子分布是不均匀的,并且载荷是非单调且非等温的。 在本报告中,考虑了可用于解决上述问题的RPV结构完整性评估的高级方法。所考虑的方法已包含在俄罗斯标准中,用于评估RPV结构的完整性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号