首页> 外文会议>2010 4th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering >Stability of Root-Soil-Complexes in Riverbanks with Different Vegetation Covers in Three Gorges Reservoir Region
【24h】

Stability of Root-Soil-Complexes in Riverbanks with Different Vegetation Covers in Three Gorges Reservoir Region

机译:三峡库区不同植被覆盖河岸根-土壤复合体的稳定性。

获取原文

摘要

Vegetation plays an important role in stabilizing soil and preventing soil erosion of slope. To reveal the stability of root-soil-complexes in riverbanks in WLFZ (water-level-fluctuation zone) of Three Gorges reservoir region, a research was conducted on four types slope, BS (bare slope), GS (slope of grass-herb), SS (slope of shrub) and FS (slope of forest), of similar soil texture and slope angle with different vegetation covers in Ruxi riverbanks. RLD (root length density), SWC (soil water content), FWC (field water capacity), ASS (soil anti-shearing strength) of each 10 cm soil layer in four types riverbank were measured. And the values of soil anti-erodibility and anti-scouribility in the 15 cm soil layer were also measured. The results showed that: (1) The EVs and EVe (enhancement value of soil anti-scouribility and of anti-erodibility) of SS were both larger and significantly higher than those of GS and FS while the values of GS and FS were small. (2) The RLD of GS, SS and FS was almost observed in the 30 cm surface soil layer and decreased with soil depth. FS had the highest RLD in every 10 cm soil layer and then the SS. (3) The SWC of BS increased with soil depth, but that of FS decreased with soil depth. The SWC and FWC of SS changed slowly in the 50 cm soil layer, and the FWC of FS and GS decreased with soil depth. The FWC of BS in 10 cm surface soil was the largest and then there was a trend of gradually increasing with soil depth in 20~50 cm layer. (4) The ASS value of GS was lower than those of other three slopes and that of FS had a little changes along the 30cm surface soil layer while it became higher at the 30~40cm soil layer. The ASS mean of the SS was highest at 0~10 cm, 20~30 cm and 40~50 cm soil layer, however, that of BS at the 10~20cm soil layer and that of FS at 30~40 cm soil layer were highest. It indicated that: (1) The soil anti-erosion capability of SS was better than that of FS and GS, and its p--hysical soil properties in 50 cm layer was more stable than that of others; (2) The surface soil of FS, especially 10 cm soil layer, had a better soil water retention; (3) The BS had a low soil stability because of the larger changes over the parameters of all layers, especially in the shallow soil. (4) SS also had a better anti-shearing stability in the 0~30 cm soil layer than GS and FS. In conclusion, this is perhaps better construction of vegetation increases stability riverbank of WLFZ significantly. Shrubs and forest played good roles in binding soil and stabilizing slope, which could improve the ecological effects. And SS riverbank was the best stable one. Thus, in vegetation reconstruction in the WLFZ, more attention should be paid to restoration of shrubs in riverbanks.
机译:植被在稳定土壤和防止土壤侵蚀方面起着重要作用。为了揭示三峡库区WLFZ(水位波动区)河岸根土复合体的稳定性,对四种坡度BS(裸坡),GS(草坡)进行了研究。汝溪河岸的土壤质地和坡度相似,SS(灌木坡度)和FS(森林坡度)相似。测量了四种类型河岸中每10 cm土层的RLD(根长密度),SWC(土壤含水量),FWC(田间持水量),ASS(土壤抗剪切强度)。并测量了15 cm土壤层的土壤抗侵蚀性和抗冲蚀性。结果表明:(1)SS的EVs和EVe(土壤抗冲刷性和抗侵蚀性增强值)均大于GS和FS,但显着高于GS和FS,而GS和FS较小。 (2)在30 cm表层土壤层中几乎观察到GS,SS和FS的RLD,随土壤深度的增加而减小。在每10 cm土层中,FS的RLD最高,其次是SS。 (3)BS的SWC随土层深度的增加而增加,而FS的SWC随土层深度的增加而减小。 SS的SWC和FWC在50 cm土层中变化缓慢,而FS和GS的FWC随土壤深度而减小。在10 cm表层土壤中,BS的FWC最大,然后随着20〜50 cm层土壤深度的增加而逐渐增加。 (4)GS的ASS值低于其他三个斜坡,而FS的ASS值在30cm表土层变化不大,而在30〜40cm土层则升高。 SS的ASS均值在0〜10 cm,20〜30 cm和40〜50 cm土层最高,而BS在10〜20cm土层的BS均值和FS在30〜40 cm土层的FS均值最高。最高。结果表明:(1)SS的土壤抗侵蚀能力优于FS和GS,其p- -- 50 cm层的土壤性状比其他土壤性状更稳定。 (2)FS表层土壤,特别是10 cm土层,保水性较好; (3)BS的土壤稳定性差,这是因为所有层的参数变化较大,尤其是在浅层土壤中。 (4)SS在0〜30 cm土层的抗剪切稳定性也比GS和FS好。总之,这也许是更好的植被建设可以显着增加WLFZ的稳定河岸。灌木和森林在固结土壤和稳定斜坡方面起着良好的作用,可以改善生态效应。 SS河岸是最稳定的河岸。因此,在WLFZ的植被重建中,应更加注意河岸灌木丛的恢复。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号