首页> 外文会议>Advances in analysis, modeling design >Model Uncertainties in 'Terzaghi and Peck' Methodsfor Estimating Settlement of Footings on Sand
【24h】

Model Uncertainties in 'Terzaghi and Peck' Methodsfor Estimating Settlement of Footings on Sand

机译:“ Terzaghi and Peck”方法估计沙滩立足点沉降的模型不确定性

获取原文

摘要

The Terzaghi and Peck (1948) method was the first for predicting the settlementof footings on sand using standard penetration test blow counts (N values). Overthe following 26 years, various modifications to this basic method were suggested.Herein, an extensive database of 426 settlement case histories is used to assess themodel factors for this family of methods. The uncertainty of the model factors ischaracterized using the coefficient of variation. Considering the model factor as arandom variable, the common “log-normality” assumption is investigated critically.The impact of model uncertainty on the reliability of settlement estimations is discussed,and criteria are given to assess their accuracy and conservatism. For settlementprediction, the uncertainty from the model factor is most influential. The resultsindicate a low accuracy for all of the methods considered.
机译:Terzaghi and Peck(1948)方法是第一个预测沉降的方法 使用标准的渗透测试击打计数(N值)来确定沙子上的立足点。超过 在随后的26年中,建议对该基本方法进行各种修改。 在此,我们使用了426个和解案例历史的广泛数据库来评估 这一系列方法的模型因素。模型因素的不确定性是 使用变异系数来表征。考虑模型因素为 对随机变量,通常对“对数正态”假设进行严格研究。 讨论了模型不确定性对沉降估算可靠性的影响, 并给出了评估其准确性和保守性的标准。结算 预测中,模型因素的不确定性影响最大。结果 表示所考虑的所有方法的准确性较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号