首页> 外文会议>2010 International Symposium on Information Theory and its Applications >Comparison of Reed-Solomon and Raptor codes for the protection of video on-demand on the erasure channel
【24h】

Comparison of Reed-Solomon and Raptor codes for the protection of video on-demand on the erasure channel

机译:比较Reed-Solomon码和Raptor码以保护擦除信道上的视频点播

获取原文

摘要

Streaming on-demand video services can be provided to an end user by transmitting video data as a sequence of Internet Protocol (IP) packets over the network. In order to maintain a sufficient video quality at the end user, video packets must be protected against erasures by means of a suitable form of error control. In this contribution we make a comparison of 2 classes of Forward Error Correction (FEC) codes: the Reed-Solomon (RS) codes and the Raptor codes. We present the decoding complexity analysis of these codes and compare their erasure decoding performance. For a given decoding complexity, the codewords of the Raptor code can be taken much longer than those of the RS code, because the decoding of the former code involves only XOR operations. For a performance target of less than one decoding error event in 4 hours, a video bitrate of 7.3 Mbit/s, a latency constraint of 10 seconds and a transmission overhead of 20%, equal erasure probabilities at the decoder input are allowed for the RS(254,212) code and for the Raptor code of size (8760,7300), whereas this RS code has a 12 times higher decoding complexity.
机译:通过在网络上传输视频数据作为Internet协议(IP)数据包序列,可以将流式点播视频服务提供给最终用户。为了在最终用户处保持足够的视频质量,必须通过适当形式的错误控制来保护视频数据包免受擦除。在本文中,我们比较了两种前向纠错(FEC)码:里德-所罗门(RS)码和猛禽码。我们介绍了这些代码的解码复杂度分析,并比较了它们的擦除解码性能。对于给定的解码复杂度,Raptor码的代码字可以比RS码的代码字花费更长的时间,因为前一个代码的解码仅涉及XOR操作。对于4小时内少于一个解码错误事件的性能目标,RS允许7.3 Mbit / s的视频比特率,10秒的等待时间约束和20%的传输开销,在解码器输入端具有相等的擦除概率(254,212)码和大小为(8760,7300)的Raptor码,而此RS码的解码复杂度则高12倍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号