首页> 外文会议>International Erosion Control Association Conference and expo >Do Engineers and Contractors Have a Choice for Slope Erosion Control?
【24h】

Do Engineers and Contractors Have a Choice for Slope Erosion Control?

机译:工程师和承包商可以选择坡度侵蚀控制吗?

获取原文

摘要

Can a hydromulch deliver equivalent or superior performance as compared to a blanket on slope applications? Do contractors and engineers have a choice for equivalent performance between a hydromulch and a blanket? In order to properly analyze these questions, one needs to evaluate objective performance data. The objective performance data that should be evaluated are germination performance and rainfall protection.For a proper comparison two ASTM standards, and variations thereof, were adopted as baseline testing criteria in order to establish performance data regarding germination and rainfall protection. The first standard is ASTM 6459: Standard Test Method for Determination of Rolled Erosion Control Product (RECP) Performance in Protecting Hill_slopes from Rainfall-Induced Erosion and the second standard is ASTM 7322: Standard Test Method for Determination of Rolled Erosion Control Product (RECP) Ability to Encourage Seed Germination and Plant Growth Under Bench-Scale Conditions. Please note: there are not any ASTM standards for determining germination and full-scale rainfall performance values for hydromulches. Obviously, these standards are intended for blankets, but in order to have an "apple" to "orange" comparison these standards were adopted for testing the hydromulch.A blanket and hydromulch were tested under similar conditions. The first product was a high performing hydromulch and the other product was a double netted straw blanket. Both products were tested on TRI Environmental's ASTM 6459 plots. The hydromulch has also been subjected to the rainfall test conditions at San Diego State University's Soil Erosion Research Laboratory (SERL). The double netted straw blanket underwent additional testing at Utah Water Research Laboratory (UWRL). The plot dimensions, rainfall intensities and rainfall durations did vary between the SERL and UWRL laboratories. Even though the SERL and UWRL testing criteria were not identical, it was concluded the hydromulch was a superior product because the SERL testing regime was more stringent and the results for the hydromulch were more desirable.When holding both products to similar standards and various conditions, it was concluded that a mulch can deliver "equivalent", if not superior, performance to a blanket. Obviously, the performance of one product will not predict the performance of another product, so caution is recommended before accepting other mulch products as an "equal" to blankets as the intent of this research is to prove that a hydromulch can deliver equivalent performance to a blanket. Engineers and contractors now have choice - a blanket or high performing mulch.
机译:与斜坡应用中的毯子相比,水覆盖膜能否提供与之相当或更高的性能?承包商和工程师是否可以在水力覆盖物和毯子之间选择等效性能?为了正确分析这些问题,需要评估客观绩效数据。应当评估的客观性能数据是发芽性能和降雨防护。 为了进行适当的比较,采用了两个ASTM标准及其变体作为基准测试标准,以建立有关发芽和降雨防护的性能数据。第一个标准是ASTM 6459:用于确定山坡上不受降雨诱发的侵蚀的滚动侵蚀控制产品(RECP)性能的标准测试方法,第二个标准是ASTM 7322:用于确定滚动侵蚀控制产品(RECP)的标准测试方法在基准规模条件下鼓励种子发芽和植物生长的能力。请注意:目前尚无任何ASTM标准来确定水覆盖土的发芽和全范围降雨性能值。显然,这些标准旨在用于毯子,但是为了使“苹果”与“橙色”进行比较,这些标准被用于测试水覆盖物。 在类似条件下测试了毯子和水覆盖物。第一种产品是高性能的水乳化剂,另一种产品是双层网状的草毯。两种产品均在TRI Environmental的ASTM 6459地块上进行了测试。该水覆盖土还受到圣地亚哥州立大学土壤侵蚀研究实验室(SERL)的降雨测试条件的影响。双层网状的草毯在犹他州水研究实验室(UWRL)进行了附加测试。在SERL和UWRL实验室之间,样地尺寸,降雨强度和降雨持续时间确实有所不同。即使SERL和UWRL的测试标准不完全相同,但可以得出结论,由于SERL测试制度更加严格,并且更希望获得结果,因此水乳化液是一种更好的产品。 当将两种产品保持在相似的标准和各种条件下时,得出的结论是,覆盖物可以提供与毯子“相当”的性能,如果不是更好的话。显然,一种产品的性能不能预测另一种产品的性能,因此,在接受其他覆盖产品作为毯子的“等同产品”之前,建议谨慎行事,因为本研究的目的是证明加水覆盖产品可以为毯子提供同等的性能。毯子。工程师和承包商现在可以选择-毯子或高性能覆盖物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号