首页> 外文会议>International conference of the system dynamics society >The Effectiveness of Force Directed Graphs vs. Causal Loop Diagrams: An experimental study
【24h】

The Effectiveness of Force Directed Graphs vs. Causal Loop Diagrams: An experimental study

机译:有向图与因果回路图的有效性:一项实验研究

获取原文

摘要

When it comes to making tough decisions in dynamic environments, decision makers usually do not make the optimal choices (Moxnes, 2004). In order to help decision makers understand the consequences of their decisions modelers usually reveal the structure of their models through Causal Loop Diagrams (CLD). Here I have run a small pilot experiment comparing an alternative method of model structure, model behavior visualization called Force Directed Graphs (FDG) in an attempt to determine which is the more effective aid to decision makers. Participants in this study were asked to make decisions in a dynamic system, and were given either a CLD of the underlying model, or a FDG as an aid. The results of this study were inconclusive as to which was more effective, but it appeared that FDG users had better strategy, but were on the whole unable to translate that into optimal decision making. This paper also discusses changes to be applied to its experimental design before this study can be run in full.
机译:在动态环境中做出艰难的决策时,决策者通常不会做出最佳选择(Moxnes,2004)。为了帮助决策者理解决策的后果,建模人员通常通过因果循环图(CLD)揭示其模型的结构。在这里,我进行了一个小规模的试验实验,比较了模型结构的另一种方法,即称为“行为有向图”(FDG)的模型行为可视化,试图确定哪种方法对决策者更有效。要求该研究的参与者在动态系统中做出决策,并获得基础模型的CLD或FDG的帮助。这项研究的结果不确定哪种方法更有效,但似乎FDG用户拥有更好的策略,但总体上无法将其转化为最佳决策。本文还讨论了在本研究可以完全进行之前要应用于其实验设计的更改。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号