首页> 外文会议>World environmental and water resources congress >Cost Comparison of Membrane Treatment and Concentrate Management Practices at Drinking Water Treatment Plants in Florida
【24h】

Cost Comparison of Membrane Treatment and Concentrate Management Practices at Drinking Water Treatment Plants in Florida

机译:佛罗里达州饮用水处理厂膜处理和浓缩液管理实践的成本比较

获取原文

摘要

Design improvements, operational simplicity, advancements in new membranematerials, and competition in membrane industry have reduced both capital and operatingcosts of nano filtration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) systems for drinking watertreatment applications. In Florida, the use of membrane technologies has increased toabout 200 MGD today in comparison to 60 MGD in 1994. Currently, there are 125membrane treatment systems in Florida with design capacities ranging from 800 gallonsper day (gpd) to 25 MGD. A survey of economics of membrane treatment (NF and RO)facilities for drinking water treatment and concentrate management options wereconducted for facilities located in Florida. Cost comparisons were based on data fromdifferent planning documents and plant surveys (Bergman, 1995; LEC, 2000; and budgetdata provided by the facilities). Since the capital costs depend on land cost, loan interests,consulting fees, design cost, pilot tests, costs of permits and other site specific factors; foraccuracy of comparison, only the construction costs were considered for capital costs.
机译:设计改进,操作简便,新膜的改进 材料以及膜行业的竞争减少了资本和运营 饮用水的纳米过滤(NF)和反渗透(RO)系统的成本 治疗应用。在佛罗里达州,膜技术的使用已增加到 今天约200 MGD,而1994年为60 MGD。目前,有125 MGD 佛罗里达的膜处理系统,设计能力为800加仑 每天(gpd)至25 MGD。膜处理(NF和RO)的经济学概述 饮用水处理设施和浓缩物管理方案是 针对位于佛罗里达州的设施进行的。成本比较是基于以下数据 不同的计划文件和工厂调查(Bergman,1995年; LEC,2000年;和预算 设施提供的数据)。由于资本成本取决于土地成本,贷款利息, 咨询费,设计成本,中试测试,许可证成本和其他现场特定因素;为了 为了比较的准确性,仅考虑了建设成本作为资本成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号