首页> 外文会议>11th International Conference on Electrostatic Precipitation(第11届国际电除尘学术会议)论文集 >The Proposal Comparison of Absorbent Preparation System of Wet Limestone-gypsum Flue Gas Desulphurization Process
【24h】

The Proposal Comparison of Absorbent Preparation System of Wet Limestone-gypsum Flue Gas Desulphurization Process

机译:湿法石灰石-石膏烟气脱硫吸收剂制备系统的提案比较

获取原文

摘要

Taking a wet limestone-gypsum Flue Gas Desulphurization (FGD) operation data for example, the absorbent preparation system is compared based on different limestone supply way in 3 proposals: purchasing limestone powder outside, dry mill and wet mill. For dry mill vertical and horizontal type are further compared. This paper has given the operation feature of mill and main configuration comparison of 3 proposals, analyzed the initial investment and operation cost difference based on fixed assets, power consumption, main maintenance cost and price of absorbent. The advantages and disadvantages of 3 proposals are given based on comparison, also dry mill is considered more suitable for long distance absorbent preparation. The paper provides advices for the choice of FGD absorbent preparation system.
机译:以湿法石灰石-石膏烟气脱硫(FGD)操作数据为例,根据三种石灰石供应方式的不同,对吸收剂制备系统进行了比较:3种建议:在外部购买石灰石粉,干法磨机和湿法磨机。对于干磨机,将进一步比较立式和卧式。给出了磨机的运行特点和三种方案的主要配置比较,根据固定资产,电耗,主要维护成本和吸收剂价格,分析了初期投资和运行成本的差异。通过比较给出了三种建议的优缺点,也认为干磨机更适合长距离吸收剂的制备。本文为选择烟气脱硫吸收剂制备系统提供了建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号