首页> 外文会议>第12届国际数学地质大会 >Log-Probability Model vs. Logistic Model for Weights of Evidence Method
【24h】

Log-Probability Model vs. Logistic Model for Weights of Evidence Method

机译:证据权重法的对数概率模型与逻辑模型

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Weighs of evidence method, as a spatial decision model, integrates map layers to update information related to prediction of spatial events (often but not limited to point events). Overlay each evidential layer further partition the study areas into smaller sub-areas (polygons with clear geological meaning) with updated posterior probability of having points per unit area. From multiplicative cascade processes point of view, mineralization can be viewed as non-linear processes resulting in element concentration anomalous enrichment and depletion in the country rocks. These two types of processes have some thing in common that both can be modeled using power-law relations of influences and scales. This paper proposes a new log-linear model can be used in weights of evidence method on the basis of local singularity theory which has been proposed for mapping geo-anomalies for delineating mineral potential targets. A new index similar to the singularity has been introduced to form a log-linear model for integrating evidential layers. The model can be used as alternative to the conventional logistic model used in weights of evidence method and logistic regression model. The new model is simple both because its simplicity for understanding and implementation.
机译:证据权衡法作为一种空间决策模型,集成了地图图层以更新与空间事件(通常但不限于点事件)的预测有关的信息。覆盖每个证据层进一步将研究区域划分为较小的子区域(具有明确地质意义的多边形),并且每单位面积具有点的更新后验概率。从倍增梯级过程的角度来看,矿化可以看作是导致乡村岩石中元素浓度异常富集和耗尽的非线性过程。这两种类型的过程有一些共同点,两者都可以使用影响力和规模的幂律关系进行建模。本文基于局部奇异性理论,提出了一种新的对数线性模型,可用于证据权重方法,该模型已被提出用于绘制地质异常图,以描绘矿物潜在目标。已引入类似于奇异性的新索引,以形成用于集成证据层的对数线性模型。该模型可以替代权重证据法和逻辑回归模型中使用的传统逻辑模型。新模型既简单,又因为它易于理解和实施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号