首页> 外文会议>International Erosion Control Association Conference and expo >Overland Flow and Rainfall Simulation Studies on Ornamental Vegetation, Compost, and Jute Netting
【24h】

Overland Flow and Rainfall Simulation Studies on Ornamental Vegetation, Compost, and Jute Netting

机译:陆上流动和降雨仿真研究观赏植被,堆肥和黄麻网

获取原文

摘要

The literature is replete with studies quantifying erosion control effectiveness from raindrop impact on various vegetation types and erosion control products. However, there is little published overland flow research documenting the effectiveness of ornamental vegetation and erosion control products in filtering sediment and nutrients from stormwater runoff. The California Department of Transportation and the Office of Water Programs, California State University, Sacramento, has conducted two studies at the Erosion Control Research Facility at Cal Poly State University, San Luis Obispo addressing the use of ornamental vegetation as an erosion control treatment. The first study addressed how well ornamental vegetation, jute netting, and a combination of jute netting and vegetation decreased soil erosion and runoff during rainfall simulation. The second study compared the performance of ornamental vegetation, 0.5 inches of compost, and jute netting treatments in decreasing sheet erosion due to overland flow. Both studies used sandy loam soil in test boxes set at a southwest aspect with 2:1 and 3:1 slopes, respectively. Treatments were evaluated by measuring the runoff quantity, sediment load, sediment concentration, pH, total dissolved solids (TDS), electrical conductivity (EC) and turbidity of the runoff. Ornamental plant species included Lonicera japonica, Lantana montevidenses, Carpobrotus edulis, Hedera helix L., Myoporum parvifolium, Rosmarinus officinalis L. and Vinca major. Rainfall simulation trials yielded significant reductions in total runoff and sediment by any treatment compared to bare soil, with 100 % vegetative cover yielding 98.6 % and 99 % reductions, respectively. Turbidity was significantly reduced by all treatments, while TDS and EC were not significantly different among trials. Average pH values for bare soil were significantly higher than those of jute netting and/or vegetation. In overland flow experiments, compost reduced runoff, sediment, and turbidity by greater than 96 % and increased EC by 430 % when compared to bare soil. Jute netting reduced runoff, sediment, turbidity, and EC by 43 %, 99 %, 97%, and 65 %, respectively, when compared to bare soil. Higher pH and salt concentrations were detected in runoff from boxes treated with compost; however, levels were not substantial enough (1673.9 μS) to be harmful to plants. Since no runoff was produced in overland flow trials, ornamental vegetation treatments were 100 % effective in controlling overland flow under test conditions. Differences among the plant species will be elucidated with future research involving steeper slopes and increased flow rates.
机译:该文献与雨滴对各种植被类型和侵蚀控制产品的影响量化进行了腐蚀控制效果的研究。然而,在雨水径流过滤沉积物和养分中,缺乏公布的陆上流程研究记录了观赏植被和侵蚀控制产品的有效性。加州交通部和加州州立大学水计划办公室,萨克拉门托,在CAL Poly州立大学的侵蚀控制研究设施中进行了两项研究,圣路易斯奥巴波普在寻址装饰植被作为侵蚀控制治疗。第一项研究解决了观赏植被,黄麻网和植被的结合如何降雨模拟过程中的土壤侵蚀和径流。第二次研究比较了观赏植被,0.5英寸的堆肥和黄麻网引起的黄麻网治疗的性能。两者都在西南方面的测试箱中使用桑迪壤土土壤,分别为2:1和3:1斜坡。通过测量径流量,沉积物,沉积物浓度,pH,总溶解的固体(TDS),径流(EC)和浊度的浊度来评估处理。观赏植物物种包括Lonicera japonica,Lantana蒙太西州,Carpobrotus Edulis,Hedera Helix L.,Myoporum Parvifolium,Rosmarinus Officinalis L.和Vinca专业。与裸土壤相比,降雨模拟试验因任何治疗而导致总径流和沉积物的总径流和沉积物减少,100%营养覆盖率分别产生98.6%和99%的减少。所有治疗都显着降低了浊度,而TDS和EC在试验中没有显着差异。裸土的平均pH值明显高于黄麻网和/或植被。在陆型流动实验中,与裸土相比,堆肥减少径流,沉积物,浊度,增加了430%的EC增加了430%。与裸土相比,黄麻网减少径流,沉积物,浊度,93%,99%,97%和65%。在用堆肥处理的盒子中检测到较高的pH和盐浓度;然而,水平不足以足够(1673.9μs)对植物有害。由于陆普林杂交试验中没有生产径流,因此装饰植被治疗在控制陆上流动的陆型流动下进行了100%。植物物种之间的差异将阐明未来的研究,涉及陡峭的斜坡和增加的流速。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号