首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Public Administration >Rating Evaluation of Seven Presidents' Ethical Leadership in South Korea
【24h】

Rating Evaluation of Seven Presidents' Ethical Leadership in South Korea

机译:韩国七位总统的道德领导力等级评估

获取原文

摘要

Citizens have ethics for their occupation and also civil service has their own professional ethics. There are many ethics according to their occupation and many subjective and objective ethics at the public service and administration. Public service influences severely on the civil life and has privilege to their action. So citizen wants high quality of subjective and objective occupational ethics to the public service. In South Korea,president's morality and ethics has not been debated and has not been measured for presidency into a field of study. It was not seemed as realistic discourse and ethical man was not proper to presidency of a nation. President Franklin Roosevelt of the United States said "Moral leadership is core of politics" and President Vathulraf Habel of the Checo Republic said "It is normal that politics must become practice of virtues"(The Evaluation Committee of Korean Presidents and the Research Center for Korean Presidency,Γ The Evaluation of Korean Presidents Γ ,Seoul: Chosun Ilbo,2002,p. 98). There have been many problems for evaluating the ethical leadership of the South Korean presidents. First of all,there is no objective measurement to evaluate president's performance.Evaluative measurement for president is focused on the president's characteristic appraisal instead of descriptive evaluation which is different from performance-oriented president's appraisal in the United States(The Evaluation Committee of Korean Presidents and the Research Center for Korean Presidency,op. Cit.,p. 99). It is very difficult to judge whether successful or unsuccessful president,because evaluation depends on evaluators' subjectivity,contingency,and situation. As all mankind have prejudice,the prejudice may affect on the evaluation of president's performance. The aim of this study is to know rating evaluation of the seven presidents' ethical leadership. This study examines some different conceptions of ethical leadership,proves how ethical leadership can be applied by the Korean presidents,assesses ethical leadership of the Korean presidents,and identified some things that Korean presidents can do to promote ethical behavior. As far as ethical leadership is concerned,there is considerable disagreement about the appropriate way to define and assess it. As Heifetz(1994) pointed out,there is no ethically neutral ground for theories of leadership,because they always involve values and implicit assumptions about proper forms of influence(Gary Yukl,Leadership in organization,sixth edition,Pearson: Prentice Hall,Upper Saddle River,NJ. 2006,p. 418).
机译:公民有职业的道德,公务员还有自己的职业道德。根据他们的职业和许多主观和客观伦理在公共服务和行政方面存在许多道德。公共服务严重影响民事生活,并有权进入他们的行动。因此,公民希望高质量的主观和客观职业道德向公共服务。在韩国,总统的道德和道德尚未讨论,尚未衡量校长进入研究领域。似乎似乎无法逼真的话语,道德人不适合一个国家主席。美国总统富兰克林罗斯福表示,“道德领导人是政治核心”,切尔各共和国总统瓦特拉夫Habel表示“正常的政治必须成为美德的实践”(韩国总统评估委员会和韩国研究中心总统,γ韩国总统γ的评价,首尔:Chosun Ilbo,2002,p。98)。评估韩国总统的道德领导有很多问题。首先,没有客观的衡量标准,以评估总统的表现。总统的评估估计专注于总统的特征评估,而不是描述性评估,这些评价与美国的表演型总统评估不同(韩国总统评估委员会和韩国总统,OP研究中心。CIT。,第99页)。很难判断是否成功或不成功的总统,因为评估取决于评估人员的主观性,应急情况和情况。随着所有人类都有偏见,偏见可能会影响总统绩效的评估。本研究的目的是要了解七位总统伦理领导的评级评估。本研究探讨了伦理领导的一些不同概念,证明了韩国总统如何应用道德领导,评估朝鲜总统的道德领导,并确定了韩国总统可以做些促进道德行为的事情。就道德领导而言,有关定义和评估的合适方法,有相当多的分歧。正如Heifetz(1994)所指出的那样,对于领导力学没有道德中立的基础,因为他们总是涉及关于适当形式的影响力的价值和隐含的假设(加里Yukl,组织领导,第六版,Pearson:Prentice Hall,上部鞍座河,NJ。2006,第418页)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号