首页> 外文会议>SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry >Squeeze Chemical for HT Applications-Have We Discarded Promising Products by Performing Unrepresentative Thermal Aging Tests?
【24h】

Squeeze Chemical for HT Applications-Have We Discarded Promising Products by Performing Unrepresentative Thermal Aging Tests?

机译:用于HT应用的挤压化学品-是否通过执行无代表性的热老化测试而丢弃了有前途的产品?

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Selecting an effective scale inhibitor for squeeze application at 170°C is no simple task. The traditional thermal stability test by aging the chemical in bulk is often perceived to be too harsh. This results in many promising products being rejected due to their apparent degradation at temperature. The alternative of conducting aging test inside core materials, hence more representative to the downhole conditions, is NOT a novel idea. However, no definitive data is available to date that can substantiate such argument and quantify the difference between the two methods. This is mainly due to the difficulties and complexity to conduct such an experiment at high temperature over a long period of time. In this paper, the results from a recent investigation are presented. It describes the detailed procedures during the planning and execution stages, lessons learnt and pitfall to avoid. A scale inhibitor was aged using two different methods, one in bulk as commonly practiced in the industry and one inside a sandstone core. The aging period varied between 45 days as in the bulk and 110 days as for the last desorbed sample from the core. The samples which were aged inside the core retained much of their inhibition efficiency whilst that aged by the traditional method (bulk) lost nearly all its effectiveness. These results CLEARLY demonstrate that the conventional method of thermal aging in bulk is unrepresentative and that the loss in performance can be quantified. A NOVEL finding from this study is the evidences of an unexpected relationship between desorption and inhibition effectiveness. The findings from this study will have great impact on selecting chemicals for HT applications. More so in those environmental sensitive regions where the use of 'yellow' (biodegradable) squeeze chemicals are mandatory. Many of these have been discarded due to theirapparent thermal degradation which is now proved to be unrepresentative.
机译:选择有效的阻垢剂以在170°C的温度下进行挤压并非易事。通常认为,通过对大量化学物质进行老化来进行传统的热稳定性测试太苛刻了。这导致许多有前景的产品由于它们在温度下的明显降解而被拒绝。在芯材内部进行时效测试的替代方法(因此更能代表井下条件)并不是一个新颖的主意。但是,到目前为止,尚无确切的数据可以证实这种论点并量化两种方法之间的差异。这主要是由于在高温下长时间进行这种实验的困难和复杂性。本文介绍了最近的调查结果。它描述了计划和执行阶段的详细过程,经验教训和避免的陷阱。使用两种不同的方法对防垢剂进行老化,一种是工业上通常采用的散装方法,另一种是在砂岩岩心中使用。老化时间从批量的45天到最后从岩心中解吸的样品的110天不等。在堆芯内部老化的样品保留了大部分抑制效果,而通过传统方法(批量)老化的样品几乎失去了全部有效性。这些结果清楚地证明了散装热老化的常规方法没有代表性,并且可以对性能损失进行量化。这项研究的新发现是解吸和抑制效果之间出乎意料的关系的证据。这项研究的结果将对选择用于HT应用的化学品有很大的影响。在那些必须使用“黄色”(可生物降解)挤压化学品的环境敏感地区,情况更是如此。由于它们的明显的热降解,许多这些已被丢弃,现已证明这是不具有代表性的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号