首页> 外文会议>Conference on Novel Optical Instrumentation for Biomedical Applications III >Photoacoustic Image Reconstruction - A Quantitative Analysis
【24h】

Photoacoustic Image Reconstruction - A Quantitative Analysis

机译:光声图像重建-定量分析

获取原文

摘要

Photoacoustic imaging is a promising new way to generate unprecedented contrast in ultrasound diagnostic imaging. It differs from other medical imaging approaches, in that it provides spatially resolved information about optical absorption of targeted tissue structures. Because the data acquisition process deviates from standard clinical ultrasound, choice of the proper image reconstruction method is crucial for successful application of the technique. In the literature, multiple approaches have been advocated, and the purpose of this paper is to compare four reconstruction techniques. Thereby, we focused on resolution limits, stability, reconstruction speed, and SNR. We generated experimental and simulated data and reconstructed images of the pressure distribution using four different methods: delay-and-sum (DnS), circular backprojection (CBP), generalized 2D Hough transform (HTA), and Fourier transform (FTA). All methods were able to depict the point sources properly. DnS and CBP produce blurred images containing typical superposition artifacts. The HTA provides excellent SNR and allows a good point source separation. The FTA is the fastest and shows the best FWHM. In our study, we found the FTA to show the best overall performance. It allows a very fast and theoretically exact reconstruction. Only a hardware-implemented DnS might be faster and enable real-time imaging. A commercial system may also perform several methods to fully utilize the new contrast mechanism and guarantee optimal resolution and fidelity.
机译:光声成像是一种有前途的新方法,可以在超声诊断成像中产生前所未有的对比度。它与其他医学成像方法的不同之处在于,它提供了有关目标组织结构的光吸收的空间分辨信息。由于数据采集过程偏离了标准的临床超声检查,因此选择合适的图像重建方法对于成功应用该技术至关重要。在文献中,提倡多种方法,并且本文的目的是比较四种重建技术。因此,我们专注于分辨率极限,稳定性,重建速度和SNR。我们使用四种不同的方法生成了实验和模拟数据,并重建了压力分布的图像:延迟总和(DnS),圆形反投影(CBP),广义2D Hough变换(HTA)和傅里叶变换(FTA)。所有方法都能够正确描绘点源。 DnS和CBP产生包含典型叠加伪像的模糊图像。 HTA提供出色的SNR,并实现了良好的点源分离。 FTA是最快的,显示出最好的FWHM。在我们的研究中,我们发现FTA表现出最佳的整体性能。它允许非常快速且理论上精确的重建。只有硬件实现的DnS可能会更快,并且可以实现实时成像。商业系统还可以执行多种方法来充分利用新的对比度机制,并确保最佳的分辨率和保真度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号