首页> 外文会议>American Chemical Society(ACS). Rubber Division Technical Meeting;American Chemical Society(ACS). Rubber Division Technical Meeting >ON DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CORD-RUBBER COMPOSITES AND FIBER-REINFORCED PLASTICS: STRUCTURAL MODELING
【24h】

ON DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CORD-RUBBER COMPOSITES AND FIBER-REINFORCED PLASTICS: STRUCTURAL MODELING

机译:橡胶/橡胶复合材料与纤维增强塑料之间的差异:结构模型

获取原文

摘要

Approaches and computational capabilities in structural modeling of cord-rubber composites (CRC) are often based on similar well established solutions for fiber-reinforced plastics (FRP). Although there are many similarities between CRC and FRP, there are crucial distinctions in their structural behavior and, therefore, should be differences in their modeling. Thus, an objective of this study is to present a systematic review of these differences, understand their nature, and provide their quantitative estimations for typical CRC materials. Major explanations of the differences are proposed. Among others, the following issues are discussed in detail: non-linearity and incompressibility of matrix, relatively big size of cords, relatively low stiffness of rubber, and deformation mechanisms of laminated CRC. The differences are discussed at several scales of structural modeling: components, micro-mechanics of uni-directional CRC, macro-mechanics of CRC, and laminated CRC. Finally, representative numerical results are demonstrated for typical CRC materials to emphasize important observations and explain their impact on predictive accuracy and confidence.
机译:脐带橡胶复合材料(CRC)结构建模中的方法和计算能力通常是基于类似良好的纤维增强塑料(FRP)的解决方案。虽然CRC和FRP之间存在许多相似之处,但它们的结构行为具有至关重要的区别,因此应该存在模拟中的差异。因此,本研究的目的是提供对这些差异的系统审查,了解其性质,并为典型的CRC材料提供它们的定量估计。提出了对差异的主要解释。其中,详细讨论了以下问题:基质的非线性和不可压缩,绳索的相对大的尺寸,橡胶刚度相对较低,层压CRC的变形机制。在结构建模的几个尺度上讨论了差异:组件,单向CRC的微型机械,CRC的宏观力学和层压CRC。最后,对典型的CRC材料证明了代表性的数值结果,以强调重要观察,并解释它们对预测准确性和信心的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号