首页> 外文会议>Information Technology Applications in Biomedicine, 2003. 4th International IEEE EMBS Special Topic Conference on >Classification accuracy of a frequency analysis method: comparison between supervised SOM and KNN
【24h】

Classification accuracy of a frequency analysis method: comparison between supervised SOM and KNN

机译:频率分析方法的分类精度:监督SOM与KNN的比较

获取原文

摘要

In FAM measurement an alternative current stimulus at several frequencies is fed to the human body resulting in physiological responses whose thresholds are recorded. The idea of the FAM is to investigate the physiological properties of the human body by analyzing those thresholds. The basic objective is to make diagnostic classification on the basis of the measured threshold values. In this study properties of two methods, supervised SOM and kNN, are applied to the diagnostic classification task. The classification accuracy of those methods in FAM data analysis is defined and properties of the methods and the data are discussed. The classification accuracy of both methods was about 70% in classification to two classes and this result shows the supervised SOM has about the same performance in accuracy as the kNN has in the classification of the FAM data.
机译:在FAM测量中,将几种频率的替代电流刺激馈入人体,从而产生生理反应,并记录其阈值。 FAM的想法是通过分析这些阈值来研究人体的生理特性。基本目标是根据测量的阈值进行诊断分类。在这项研究中,将监督SOM和kNN两种方法的属性应用于诊断分类任务。定义了这些方法在FAM数据分析中的分类准确性,并讨论了这些方法和数据的属性。两种方法在两类分类中的分类准确率约为70%,该结果表明,监督的SOM在准确度方面与kNN在FAM数据的分类中具有相同的性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号