首页> 外文会议>INFOCOM 2000. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. Proceedings. IEEE >Comparisons of packet scheduling algorithms for fair service among connections on the Internet
【24h】

Comparisons of packet scheduling algorithms for fair service among connections on the Internet

机译:互联网连接之间公平服务的分组调度算法的比较

获取原文

摘要

We investigate the performance of TCP under three representatives of packet scheduling algorithms at the router. Our main focus is to investigate how fair service can be provided for elastic applications sharing the link. Packet scheduling algorithms that we consider are FIFO (first in first out), RED (random early detection), and DRR (deficit round robin). Through simulation and analysis results, we discuss the degree of achieved fairness in those scheduling algorithms. Furthermore, we propose a new algorithm which combines RED and DRR algorithms in order to prevent the unfairness property of the original DRR algorithm, which appears in some circumstances where we want to resolve the scalability problem of the DRR algorithm. In addition to the TCP Reno version, we consider TCP Vegas to investigate its capability of providing fairness. The results show that the principle of TCP Vegas conforms to DRR, but it cannot help improving the fairness among connections in FIFO and RED cases, which seems to be a substantial obstacle for the deployment of TCP Vegas.
机译:我们调查TCP在路由器上的分组调度算法的三个代表下的表现。我们的主要重点是调查如何为共享链接的弹性应用提供公平的服务。我们考虑的数据包调度算法是FIFO(首先排在第一次),红色(随机早期检测)和DRR(赤字循环)。通过仿真和分析结果,我们讨论了这些调度算法中实现的公平程度。此外,我们提出了一种新的算法,它结合了红色和DRR算法,以防止原始DRR算法的不公平性,这在我们想要解决DRR算法的可扩展性问题的某些情况下出现。除了TCP雷诺版外,我们还考虑TCP VEGAS调查其提供公平性的能力。结果表明,TCP VEGAS的原则符合DRR,但它无法帮助改善FIFO和红色案件中联系之间的公平性,这似乎是部署TCP VEGAS的实质性障碍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号