首页> 外文会议>Formal Engineering Methods, 2000. ICFEM 2000. Third IEEE International Conference on >SPIN vs. VIS: a case study on the formal verification of the ATMR protocol
【24h】

SPIN vs. VIS: a case study on the formal verification of the ATMR protocol

机译:SPIN与VIS:以ATMR协议的形式验证为例

获取原文

摘要

Nowadays, there exist a wide variety of verification tools. Some, like the SPIN model checker, are designed and mainly used for the verification of interleaving software systems, such as communication protocols. Others, like VIS (Verification Interacting with Synthesis), are designed and used for synchronous hardware systems verification. In this paper, we compare and contrast SPIN and VIS. In particular, we devote a special attention to the efficiency of these tools for the verification of communications protocols that can be implemented either in software or hardware. As a basis of our comparison, we formally describe and verify the ATMR (Asynchronous Transfer Mode Ring) medium access protocol using SPIN, and its hardware implementation using VIS. We believe that this study is of particular interest, as more and more protocols, like the ATM protocol stack, are being implemented in hardware in order to match high speed requirements. However, this is not a formal comparison of SPIN and VIS.
机译:如今,存在各种各样的验证工具。一些诸如SPIN模型检查器之类的软件被设计并主要用于验证交错软件系统,例如通信协议。诸如VIS(与综合交互的验证)之类的其他软件则被设计并用于同步硬件系统验证。在本文中,我们比较并对比了SPIN和VIS。特别是,我们特别关注这些工具的有效性,以验证可以以软件或硬件形式实现的通信协议。作为比较的基础,我们正式描述和验证了使用SPIN的ATMR(异步传输模式环)媒体访问协议,以及使用VIS的硬件实现。我们相信这项研究特别有意义,因为越来越多的协议(例如ATM协议栈)正在硬件中实现,以适应高速需求。但是,这不是SPIN和VIS的正式比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号