首页> 外文会议>IEE Seminar on New Developments in Ceramics Manufacturing, 1998 >A comparative performance analysis of distributed queue dual busaccess control methods
【24h】

A comparative performance analysis of distributed queue dual busaccess control methods

机译:分布式队列双总线访问控制方法的比较性能分析

获取原文

摘要

Simulation results comparing several distributed queue dual bus(DQDB) medium access control methods are described. To address accessfairness problems in the IEEE P802.6 proposed standard for DQDBmetropolitan area networks (MANs), a method known as bandwidth balancing(BWB) was accepted as part of the draft proposed standard version 10(D10). Another method, known as reservation request control (RRC), wasreported earlier which showed that it also reduces these access fairnessproblems. It is shown that, under a wide range of operating conditions,RRC provides lower access time than BWB, typically an order-of-magnitudefaster convergence to a fair operating point, and performance very closeto an ideal round-robin queuing discipline. However, the additional RRCcomplexity and substantial differences between it and the current IEEEP802.6 proposed standard indicate that RRC is not justified for the nearterm. It is concluded that, with only minor added complexity, BWBprovides the needed performance improvements for currently envisionedDQDB MANs
机译:仿真结果比较几种分布式队列双总线 描述了(DQDB)媒体访问控制方法。解决访问 DQDB的IEEE P802.6提议标准中的公平性问题 城域网(MAN),一种称为带宽平衡的方法 (BWB)被接受为拟议标准版本10草案的一部分 (D10)。另一种方法,称为预留请求控制(RRC),是 较早的报道表明,这也降低了这些访问公平 问题。结果表明,在广泛的工作条件下, RRC提供的访问时间比BWB短,通常为一个数量级 更快地收敛到合理的工作点,并且性能非常接近 到理想的循环队列规则。但是,附加的RRC 它与当前IEEE的复杂性和实质性差异 P802.6提出的标准表明,RRC在不久的将来是不合理的 学期。得出的结论是,BWB仅增加了很小的复杂性 提供当前设想的所需性能改进 DQDB城域网

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号