首页> 外文会议>Specialty conference on measurement of toxic and related air pollutants >Advantages of continuous non-methane organic carbon monitoring over direct fid analysis
【24h】

Advantages of continuous non-methane organic carbon monitoring over direct fid analysis

机译:连续进行非甲烷有机碳监测比直接分析更具有优势

获取原文

摘要

The most commonly used continuous emission monitor for volatile organic emissions in stationary sources is the total hydrocarbon analyzer which is a Flame Ionization Detector (FID). The limitations of this technique is that that FID has different response factors for different functional groups, as a result its response is not proportional to the total carbon content of the air emissions. Moreover it also responds to CH4 which is often not considered a serious threat to public health. Nonmethane organic carbons (NMOC) is a measure of total organic carbon except that from methane. EPA standard method 25 is used to meausre NMOC emission from stationary sources. In this paper we discuss the development of a novel instrument for continuous on-line monitoring of NMOC in emission sources as well as in ambient air and compare its performance with direct FID analysis.
机译:用于固定源中挥发性有机物排放的最常用的连续排放监测器是总烃分析仪,它是一种火焰电离检测器(FID)。该技术的局限性在于,FID对不同的功能组具有不同的响应因子,因此其响应与空气排放的总碳含量不成比例。此外,它还对CH4做出反应,而CH4通常不被视为对公共健康的严重威胁。非甲烷有机碳(NMOC)是除甲烷以外的总有机碳的量度。 EPA标准方法25用于衡量固定来源的NMOC排放。在本文中,我们讨论了一种用于连续在线监测排放源以及周围空气中NMOC的新型仪器的开发,并将其性能与直接FID分析进行了比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号