首页> 外文会议>Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1997. Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference of the IEEE >The design, development and application of a virtual instrument system to assess vibrotactile stimulation to interrupt neonatal apnea
【24h】

The design, development and application of a virtual instrument system to assess vibrotactile stimulation to interrupt neonatal apnea

机译:虚拟仪器系统的设计,开发和应用,以评估触觉刺激来中断新生儿呼吸暂停

获取原文

摘要

Premature infants are susceptible to apnea. Presently physical stimulation, administered to interrupt apneic episodes, is accomplished by hand contact, which is often delayed and presents infection risks. This study developed a software system to collect and analyze data to study the efficacy and safety of mechanical vibrotactile stimulation (VTS) as a means of interrupting an apneic episode. This software system was utilized to compare VTS (n=12) and hand stimulation (n=12). VTS and traditional hand stimulation were found to be equally effective in terminating apnea (9/12 (75%) vs. 10/12 (80%)). Mean time to resumption of breathing from onset of stimulation was similar (VTS 3.1/spl plusmn/2.6 seconds vs. hand 3.7/spl plusmn/4.1 seconds, p=0.67), as was total apnea duration (VTS 28.1/spl plusmn/12.1 seconds vs. hand 28.5/spl plusmn/5.2 seconds, p=0.93). The duration of VTS was half as long as hand stimulation (VTS 2.9/spl plusmn/1.7 seconds vs. hand 6.8/spl plusmn/5.4 seconds, p=0.05). No adverse effects of VTS were noted Overall, VTS was similar to hand stimulation in its ability to end apneic spells. Since the duration of VTS was half that of hand stimulation VTS seems more efficient in interrupting apnea.
机译:早产儿容易患呼吸暂停。目前,通过中断手接触来实施物理刺激以中断呼吸暂停发作,这通常会延迟并且存在感染风险。这项研究开发了一个软件系统,用于收集和分析数据,以研究机械性触感刺激(VTS)作为中断呼吸暂停发作的手段的功效和安全性。该软件系统用于比较VTS(n = 12)和手刺激(n = 12)。发现VTS和传统手刺激在终止呼吸暂停方面同样有效(9/12(75%)对10/12(80%))。从刺激开始到恢复呼吸的平均时间相似(VTS 3.1 / spl plusmn / 2.6秒与手3.7 / spl plusmn / 4.1秒,p = 0.67),总呼吸暂停持续时间相似(VTS 28.1 / spl plusmn / 12.1)秒vs.手28.5 / spl加/5.2秒,p = 0.93)。 VTS的持续时间是手刺激的一半(VTS 2.9 / spl加/1.7秒与手6.8 / spl加/5.4秒,p = 0.05)。没有发现VTS的不利影响总体而言,VTS在终止呼吸暂停的能力方面与手部刺激相似。由于VTS的持续时间是手刺激的一半,因此VTS在中断呼吸暂停方面似乎更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号